Leeuwarden shots spin-off

AK01 · Post by **AK01** » 26 Jun 2008, 19:15

More then 100 pictures from one person????????
With the risk of being flamed , is there anyone waiting for that?
Regards

Leeuwarden · Post by **Leeuwarden** » 26 Jun 2008, 19:19

AK01 wrote:More then 100 pictures from one person????????
With the risk of being flamed , is there anyone waiting for that?
Regards

There is no risk being flamed. You are right

PiPoServisAir · Post by **PiPoServisAir** » 26 Jun 2008, 19:48

Whats the problem about 100 picture's. I see some user upload 3 time 40 pictures or 2 times 30, so i dont see any problem.

Danny

Redskin · Post by **Redskin** » 26 Jun 2008, 20:00

The problem is that this forum is used to show your BEST photo's and not ALL your photo's.

PiPoServisAir · Post by **PiPoServisAir** » 26 Jun 2008, 20:11

I Also thought that this forum and photo topic is a place to get tips, so i place some more photo's of 1 plane to hear comment what i did wrong or good. So sorry for the lot of photo's but this topic is already '9' pages big so don't be so

Danny

Borobudur · Post by **Borobudur** » 26 Jun 2008, 20:24

PiPoServisAir wrote:So sorry for the lot of photo's but this topic is already '9' pages big so don't be so

From different people...instead of almost a whole page with photo's of one person...Pfff....

mitchell · Post by **mitchell** » 26 Jun 2008, 20:27

And its still an aviation forum? why photos of the police then.

PiPoServisAir · Post by **PiPoServisAir** » 26 Jun 2008, 20:35

GOD damn, =censored=, sorry that i put 100 picture's in here, yes i see that not every 1 upload more then 100 in 1 time, but some do it in 3 times. So whats the problem.

But ok this will be the last time i will post something here, and hope you all a good nite. If it is to hard to say any comment on the photo's NO only how many i upload.

Sorry for you all.........

Pease all and hope to see you all maybe again some where.

Danny

AK01 · Post by **AK01** » 26 Jun 2008, 20:43

PiPoServisAir wrote:I Also thought that this forum and photo topic is a place to get tips, so i place some more photo's of 1 plane to hear comment what i did wrong or good. So sorry for the lot of photo's but this topic is already '9' pages big so don't be so

Danny

Danny,
Nothing personal, there are no rules about the number of pictures you are allowed to post on this forum.
Most people post pictures of what, in their opinion ,are highlights or good shots.
I would like to see one KDC10 low and one Irish PC9, not 15, 20 or more.
My suggestion is that you shows your top 10 and give a link to a website or photobook you have somewhere on the internet, and let the people themselves decide if they want to see more.
But once again, there is no restriction (Admin??) so go ahead.

Best Regards Pieter,

Marco · Post by **Marco** » 26 Jun 2008, 21:01

maybe a tip for Pipo, use an other way to put your copyright on your pics. On some pics it consumes all of my attention in stead of the plane.

Once I had a discussion with the Scramble photo editorial man about the load of my pics. He said to me that he basicly only wanted 1 picture of a particular plane and not 10. I suggested then that would I like in a picture, might not be liked by the other.

This is what I think the most of us want to see here as well. Just 1 shot of 1 plane, the in your eyes the best. The problem with putting a huge number of pics in just 1 message might be became the attention which is slipping away. Only 1 minute ago I watched the pics, but all I can remember is the way of the copyright. For the rest of the pics I can for example remember some nice flares, banking old timers, the do remove tag on the Hornet and some others.

So for me it is not a problem of putting a 1000 pics in 1 message, but I try to minimize it to at least 10-20 pics per day and with a max of 30. I my eyes anything above must have some less nice pics.

just my thoughts.

PiPoServisAir · Post by **PiPoServisAir** » 26 Jun 2008, 21:10

Marco wrote:maybe a tip for Pipo, use an other way to put your copyright on your pics. On some pics it consumes all of my attention in stead of the plane.

I use a free tool program to at copyright, don't know to do it in PS or Lightroom. But now you say i think only white letters with no shadow was better.

Greats Danny

sfeyenoord1 · Post by **sfeyenoord1** » 26 Jun 2008, 22:11

In my opinion i got to agree over 100 is a bit to much. Personally i try to get it down to max 20 on the forums, 30-40 on my site. But there are no restrictions, and the photographer can decide what to post and what not to post.

There are a few tips for your photographs that i have.
To kick off, the point of view, by coming closer a little bit you dont have any fences on your picture. This is for me personally always something that anoys me in photographs. But logical the fences are really needed!

Second is that i've read you have been photographing in the auto modes. Try to play with the modes Av (so diafragma choice) wich will give the right depth in every photograph, wich will fit for the object. Personally i mostly use F7.1 or F8.0 in normall conditions.

Third thing is for the proppellor driven planes, and for the helo's. If you use Tv (shutterspeed choice) you can get a longer shutterspeed wich will result in propellor blur instead of 'frozen' propellors. I personally go around 1/320s shutterspeed with most propellor driven planes/helicopters.

But thats all a matter of practice, so you get to know what are (for you) the best settings to make even nicer pictures!

Greetings,
Stefan

Post by **Key** » 26 Jun 2008, 23:32

Thank you all for giving Danny the feedback he was hoping for. PiPo, I hope you in turn will try to see the point of view of people commenting on the number of pics.
There is indeed no limit here, but it is a fact that one good photo will impress viewers more than twenty average ones. Over one hundred is a guarantee to loose everyone's attention. Even to get feedback, a dozen will do I think. As said, the decision is yours but these are the tips...

Taking a quick look at your photos, I think you're doing fine. Many people will have worse results at their first airshow with a new camera. As explained already, automatic exposure is not always working - and always good for some photo-talk, like here. I think you have an eye for nice compostions and you have no trouble framing fast-moving planes. My general tip therefore is: just keep going.

Erik

Iwan Bogels · Post by **Iwan Bogels** » 26 Jun 2008, 23:48

PiPoServisAir wrote:I Also thought that this forum and photo topic is a place to get tips, so i place some more photo's of 1 plane to hear comment what i did wrong or good. So sorry for the lot of photo's but this topic is already '9' pages big so don't be so

Danny

Hi Danny,

Even constructief.....

- Als je je eigen foto's vergelijkt met het werk van anderen, waar zitten volgens jou dan de verschillen ?

- Zie je ook wel eens foto's van anderen waarvan je denkt: "Jeetje, da's een slechte plaat" ?

- Wat vind je zelf je sterke punt van je eigen werk, aan waaraan vind je dat je nog moet werken ?

Ik hoor graag je mening van je.

Groet,
Iwan

PiPoServisAir · Post by **PiPoServisAir** » 27 Jun 2008, 00:02

Ben soms jaloers in de mooie glans in vliegtuigen vooral als het donker is en je baan streep of reflex van lichten er in ziet., of je ziet duidelijk als een plane nieuw verf laag heeft. Bij mij lijkt het soms als of er een verkleur laag over zit
Denk ook dat ik daar door onzeker ben over mijn fotos.
Of soms zie ik op een foto bijvoorbeeld de AB heel duidelijk.
Deze vind ik 1 van mijn beste van afgelopen weekend.

A: je ziet AB best duidelijk en ook de hot air.
B: je ziet dat een flare nog net ontsteekt.
Deze maakte ik liggend op de grond, kon mooi omdat hij midden tussen publiek opsteeg:

Ik had mijn focus punt in het midden, en focus op Chinook. Daardoor wist ik dat gras onduidelijk zou worden en diepte zou geven.

Het is denk ik gewoon mijn onzekerheid, omdat de meeste hier al wat meer ervaring hebben. En ook wat beter lenzen. Oké de Sigma 300mm is heel goed, maar merk wel dat hij soms traag is met zoom.

Grt Danny