EHGR 16-01-2008
Forum rules
 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
-
Thijs
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 5085
- Joined: 10 Feb 2003, 13:42
- Subscriber Scramble: Thijs
- Location: West Intercourse Island
- Contact:
The UH-1 is taken with 300*1.4 (converter)*1.6 (digital factor) = 672mm Analogue MM. And still it was 3/4 in my frame.Wow nice pictures from both of you! Looks like you could get pretty close!
But a picture during landing can be taken with at least 200MM, when using the taxiway in front of you 200 should be enough. Take also a look at the EXIF info. Firefox has a tool for this.
Therefore it is better the Chinook and Cougar's will move to Gilze
Assume makes an ASS of U and ME.