ETAD 02-10-2015

ImageThe forum for all movements and news about Spangdahlem Air Base.

Forum rules
ImageMode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary
Post Reply
JetStar2
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1036
Joined: 01 May 2004, 23:08
Subscriber Scramble: JetStar2
Location: Luxemburg
Contact:

ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by JetStar2 »

Ex around 1130 local "death01" A10s comming from Estonia.
Banter
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1043
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 15:02

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Banter »

x5 :wink:
Raptor25
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 213
Joined: 04 Oct 2013, 20:26
Subscriber Scramble: Y

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Raptor25 »

Hello, any news ? Thx
User avatar
Sjoerd
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2002
Joined: 26 Nov 2002, 16:46
Location: underneath the AMC route

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Sjoerd »

No idea if they've landed yet, but seems likely they are here for; http://www.eur.army.mil/jmtc/CombinedResolve.html

Same as previous A-10 deployments (ID, MI) last year. So it would seem a 3-4 week deployment to me.
-Good intell, allows for good decision making!-
User avatar
maurits
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1679
Joined: 27 Apr 2004, 23:36
Type of spotter: full military
Subscriber Scramble: maurits
Location: IJsselstein

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by maurits »

Mode-s logged are these two:

AE193F 80-0140
DEFAULT 2015-10-02 13:25:08 A-10A United States --- Alfeld2, DE 7435 ---

AE1942 80-0144
DEFAULT 2015-10-02 13:24:59 A-10A United States --- Alfeld2, DE --- 0
kind regards,

Maurits
Tu154
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 586
Joined: 04 Oct 2013, 10:58
Subscriber Scramble: Jos

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Tu154 »

5 A10s landed.

Jos
User avatar
Adraf
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 875
Joined: 13 Mar 2015, 08:57
Type of spotter: Military
Location: ETAD

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Adraf »

02.10.2015

C-17A 94-0065 164th AW - arr 0640
C-17A 06-6167 436th AW - dep 1915
C-17A 07-7187 437th AW - arr 1635

KC-135R 58-0063 157th ARW - dep 1110
KC-135R 60-0356 22nd ARW
KC-135R 62-3506 157th ARW - dep 1140

KC-130J 168071 VMGR-252 - arr 1640/dep 1735

A-10C 78-0642 75th FS - arr 1410
A-10C 79-0189 74th FS - arr 1410
A-10C 79-0193 74th FS - arr 1410
A-10C 80-0149 74th FS - arr 1410
A-10C 81-0995 74th FS - arr 1410

F-16CM 90-0818 480th FS
F-16CM 90-0827 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0338 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0340 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0342 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0351 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0352 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0361 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0402 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0407 480th FS
F-16DM 91-0472 480th FS
Last edited by Adraf on 06 Oct 2015, 21:31, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Stephan Lodewijks
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 5058
Joined: 13 Jun 2005, 12:54
Type of spotter: I shall say this only once: (ex-)MILITARY!!!! :-)
Subscriber Scramble: Stephan Lodewijks
Location: Eindhoven

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Stephan Lodewijks »

Adraf wrote:I hope the serials are right...
Huh...?? (I would have made sure the serials are right before posting...)
H. van Eupen
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:35
Type of spotter: militair
Subscriber Scramble: H. van Eupen

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by H. van Eupen »

Small correction:

A-10C 78-0642 23rd FG - arr 1410
A-10C 80-0149 23rd FG - arr 1410
A-10C 79-0189 23rd FG - arr 1410
A-10C 79-0193 23rd FG - arr 1410
A-10C 81-0995 23rd FG - arr 1410

F-16CM 90-0813 480th FS -> not seen by me and others...
F-16CM 90-0818 480th FS
F-16CM 90-0827 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0338 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0342 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0351 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0352 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0361 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0407 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0340 480th FS
F-16CM 91-0402 480th FS
F-16DM 91-0472 480th FS
User avatar
Adraf
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 875
Joined: 13 Mar 2015, 08:57
Type of spotter: Military
Location: ETAD

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Adraf »

Stephan Lodewijks wrote:
Adraf wrote:I hope the serials are right...
Huh...?? (I would have made sure the serials are right before posting...)
I was a little confused because Mode-S source was completely wrong and I couldn't take photos.. With posting this sentence I made clear nobody can reproach me for something. I did misstakes and I like revisions.. Thank You H. van Eupen!
User avatar
Paveway
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 907
Joined: 18 Sep 2002, 10:30
Type of spotter: Military
Subscriber Scramble: Paveway

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Paveway »

Thanks for posting!
Vanlion
Scramble Rookie
Scramble Rookie
Posts: 62
Joined: 24 Feb 2013, 16:39
Subscriber Scramble: Rob van Leeuwen

Re: ETAD 02-10-2015

Post by Vanlion »

Adraf wrote:
Stephan Lodewijks wrote:
Adraf wrote:I hope the serials are right...
Huh...?? (I would have made sure the serials are right before posting...)
I was a little confused because Mode-S source was completely wrong and I couldn't take photos.. With posting this sentence I made clear nobody can reproach me for something. I did misstakes and I like revisions.. Thank You H. van Eupen!
Thanks for your Log, and great that you indicate that you are not sure about some items, rather than not doing so!
Post Reply

Return to “Spangdahlem”