De Kooy (EHKD/DHR) - 2008

Otto · Post by **Otto** » 04 Sep 2008, 11:47

04/9

NYB401 SA316B (M-1) 40 Sm

ETA 14:50LT (requested hangarspace to stay overnight)
ETD 05/9

Otto · Post by **Otto** » 05 Sep 2008, 15:01

05/9

Bluebird72 SA316B (A-...) 300 Sq
NYB401 SA316B M-1 40 Sm (ARR/DEP)

NRN410 & NRN420 2x SH-14 departed to Rotterdam for the "wereld haven dagen"

engine642 · Post by **engine642** » 05 Sep 2008, 19:49

A-301 stood on the platform at 10.45 local. (saw it during a visit at the base)

Otto · Post by **Otto** » 09 Sep 2008, 03:42

09/9

Bluebird59 SA316B (A-301) 300 Sq.

ETA 12:50LT
ETD ???

Ghanz · Post by **Ghanz** » 09 Sep 2008, 08:52

Also expected:

CH-47D (D-667 ?) as Corona4

ETA 12.30 LT
ETD ???

Greetz,

Hans

Ghanz · Post by **Ghanz** » 09 Sep 2008, 11:56

Otto wrote:09/9

Bluebird59 SA316B (A-301) 300 Sq.

ETA 12:50LT
ETD ???

ETD 13:30

Greetz,

Hans

aviodromefriend · Post by **aviodromefriend** » 09 Sep 2008, 12:42

Ghanz wrote:Also expected:

CH-47D (D-667 ?) as Corona4

ETA 12.30 LT
ETD ???

Greetz,

Hans

ETD 14.30 according to http://www.sgdk.nl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (but there an ETA 13.30 was stated. Mostly Chinooks at De Kooy are just flying by in the distance, also while mentioned at sgdk

)

medebruijn · Post by **medebruijn** » 09 Sep 2008, 15:27

It's a request for landing at EHKD, that's why it's an expectation at http://www.sgdk.nl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
But in aviation a lot can change...!
If the endurance is enough for the return flight back to EHSB, then the landing at EHKD is not necessary.

Ghanz · Post by **Ghanz** » 09 Sep 2008, 17:10

And at 12.15 (when I last checked) it was also on the planned flights list of De Kooy itself.

And I know, a lot can change in aviation.

I just don't have continuous access to internet, so, when I post an expectation (and when the info is from sgdk.nl I give credit

), I'm not always able to post a change of plans.

Greetz,

Hans

aviodromefriend · Post by **aviodromefriend** » 09 Sep 2008, 17:59

Yeah, of course a lot can change.

But it is frustrating if you are waiting for an aircraft, and you only see it flying at a big distance (or only hear it passing the CTR on the scanner). And it is even more frustrating if it is mostly the same type of aircraft from the same operator from the same airbase from the same squadron etc. Personally it gives me a feeling the Chinook-guys don't take their counterparts in the DHC seriously.

I thought all the fields in the Netherlands which house dutch military choppers are now part of the same command (for quite a while now). I think it would make sence to use all the fields then too by all the types, also for getting used to each other (but who am I).

Spine24 · Post by **Spine24** » 09 Sep 2008, 18:20

aviodromefriend wrote:Yeah, of course a lot can change.

But it is frustrating if you are waiting for an aircraft, and you only see it flying at a big distance (or only hear it passing the CTR on the scanner). And it is even more frustrating if it is mostly the same type of aircraft from the same operator from the same airbase from the same squadron etc. Personally it gives me a feeling the Chinook-guys don't take their counterparts in the DHC seriously.

I thought all the fields in the Netherlands which house dutch military choppers are now part of the same command (for quite a while now). I think it would make sence to use all the fields then too by all the types, also for getting used to each other (but who am I).

Is this a serious post, or sarcastic?

kiwi · Post by **kiwi** » 09 Sep 2008, 20:31

Spine24 wrote:
aviodromefriend wrote:Yeah, of course a lot can change.

But it is frustrating if you are waiting for an aircraft, and you only see it flying at a big distance (or only hear it passing the CTR on the scanner). And it is even more frustrating if it is mostly the same type of aircraft from the same operator from the same airbase from the same squadron etc. Personally it gives me a feeling the Chinook-guys don't take their counterparts in the DHC seriously.

I thought all the fields in the Netherlands which house dutch military choppers are now part of the same command (for quite a while now). I think it would make sence to use all the fields then too by all the types, also for getting used to each other (but who am I).
Is this a serious post, or sarcastic?

Yeah I don't get it either :S
Why would they even get close to De Kooy if they don't need fuel? They would only fly in the way of the daily traffic at De Kooy. I assume you know De Kooy is the most active airport in the Netherlands, apart from Schiphol?
And getting used to DHC counterparts or take them seriously? Dude nothing has changed, only the name has changed and that the former Marine Luchtvaart Dienst is now under the same command as the rest of the DHC. You think before the merge the 'Chinook guys' have never seen a Lynx or De Kooy up close? Nothing in your post has any sense to it

CRUISECONTROL · Post by **CRUISECONTROL** » 10 Sep 2008, 10:38

Ter info:
"DIAMOND11" (L-07) pc-7 nu (1036LT) onderweg, na een touch and go op leeuwarden.

Ghanz · Post by **Ghanz** » 10 Sep 2008, 10:54

CRUISECONTROL wrote:Ter info:
"DIAMOND11" (L-07) pc-7 nu (1036LT) onderweg, na een touch and go op leeuwarden.

Just arrived.

ETD 13.30 LT

Greetz,

Hans

Otto · Post by **Otto** » 10 Sep 2008, 13:04

DIAMOND11 ETD 13:00LT

Further more:
DFONL AN-2 Classic wings arrived this morning (ATA 11:00LT)
ETD 15:30LT

GBIMU S-61N Bristow. ETA 18:10LT