F-35 Lightning II developments
Forum rules
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
3 Ausy F35's departed Luke yesterday (08-feb-21) for Hawai.
Callsign for the 35's was ASY1127. Support was 2x KC30A (ASY401 +413) and one C17A (ASY415).
Callsign for the 35's was ASY1127. Support was 2x KC30A (ASY401 +413) and one C17A (ASY415).
- Flyboy
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2721
- Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
- Type of spotter: F4
- Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
- Location: Hillywood
- Contact:
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
Hidden in a newsitem about F-35 airshow appereance
“The engines on A-model F-35s have been running “hot,” or close to the limits of their design, and that heat has caused premature cracks, or delamination, of turbine blade coatings,” Bloomberg reported on Feb. 10, 2021. “That’s required the engines to be removed or repaired earlier than anticipated, aggravating an already backlogged depot system. The cracks in the coating aren’t a flight safety issue, but they reduce an engine’s useful life, said a defense official.”
“The Pentagon’s F-35 program office has briefed Defense Department acquisition leaders that, in the most extreme case, up to 20% of Air Force F-35s will lack engines by 2025. It’s a number that assumes corrective actions underway will be ineffective, or can’t be executed by the service, program office or Raytheon’s Pratt & Whitney engine unit, according to two defense officials.”
“The Air Force is working “diligently” with the F-35 Joint Program Office and Pratt & Whitney “to resolve supply and maintenance issues” with the engine, according to an Air Combat Command statement. Reducing air show performances will help “ensure the Air Force has enough engine capacity to meet operational requirements,” it added.”
Any news on this? Or can this be regarded as Teething problems...
“The engines on A-model F-35s have been running “hot,” or close to the limits of their design, and that heat has caused premature cracks, or delamination, of turbine blade coatings,” Bloomberg reported on Feb. 10, 2021. “That’s required the engines to be removed or repaired earlier than anticipated, aggravating an already backlogged depot system. The cracks in the coating aren’t a flight safety issue, but they reduce an engine’s useful life, said a defense official.”
“The Pentagon’s F-35 program office has briefed Defense Department acquisition leaders that, in the most extreme case, up to 20% of Air Force F-35s will lack engines by 2025. It’s a number that assumes corrective actions underway will be ineffective, or can’t be executed by the service, program office or Raytheon’s Pratt & Whitney engine unit, according to two defense officials.”
“The Air Force is working “diligently” with the F-35 Joint Program Office and Pratt & Whitney “to resolve supply and maintenance issues” with the engine, according to an Air Combat Command statement. Reducing air show performances will help “ensure the Air Force has enough engine capacity to meet operational requirements,” it added.”
Any news on this? Or can this be regarded as Teething problems...
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
Getting caught up with my log over the middle of Jan and Feb.
First flights:
AF-273 (18-5382) no markings. Not even a tail number. Feb 1, 2021.
BF-111 (169696) no markings. Not even a tail number. Feb 2, 2021.
Also noted during Jan and Feb but not on their first flight were:
AF-270 18-5379 (354 FW, 356 FS), Jan 26, 2021.
AF-271 18-5380/AK (354 FW, 356 FS), Jan 26, 2021.
AF-272 18-5381 (354 FW, 356 FS), Jan 26, 2021.
Tally.
First flights:
AF-273 (18-5382) no markings. Not even a tail number. Feb 1, 2021.
BF-111 (169696) no markings. Not even a tail number. Feb 2, 2021.
Also noted during Jan and Feb but not on their first flight were:
AF-270 18-5379 (354 FW, 356 FS), Jan 26, 2021.
AF-271 18-5380/AK (354 FW, 356 FS), Jan 26, 2021.
AF-272 18-5381 (354 FW, 356 FS), Jan 26, 2021.
Tally.
- Stratofreighter
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 22206
- Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
- Location: Netherlands
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
https://www.reuters.com/article/turkey- ... SL8N2KP29S
https://www.reuters.com/article/turkey- ... SL8N2KP29SFEBRUARY 19, 202111:24 AM
UPDATED 10 MINUTES AGO
Turkey has hired a Washington-based law firm
to lobby for its readmission to the U.S. F-35 fighter jet programme
after it was suspended over its purchase of Russian air defences,
a contract filed with the U.S. Department of Justice showed.
Ankara had ordered more than 100 stealth fighters and has been making parts for their production,
but was removed from the programme in 2019
after it bought the Russian S-400 missile defence systems,
which Washington says threaten the F-35s.
It has now hired law firm Arnold & Porter
for “strategic advice and outreach” to U.S. authorities,
in a six-month contract worth $750,000 which started this month.
November 2024 update at FokkerNews.nl....
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
First flight F-35A 18-5446/HL destined for the 4 FS, Feb 21, 2021. Do not know the AF number. Anyone?
Tally.
Tally.
- Typhoon3030
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 169
- Joined: 16 Apr 2011, 11:47
- Type of spotter: Luftfahrtfotografie
- Subscriber Scramble: Typhoon3030
- Location: ETSI
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
Still FY18 !?
- Melchior Timmers
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: 13 May 2006, 18:06
- Subscriber Scramble: Melchior Timmers
- Location: Soest
- Contact:
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
AF-275 is the next in sequence..... Also,the FY 18-54xx is till in doubt. Some mention AX-17/22 are 18-5441/5448 but that obvious is not correct.
Others mention AL-13/14 being 18-5441/18-5442, but that leaves 18-5439/5440 unknown.....
Others mention AL-13/14 being 18-5441/18-5442, but that leaves 18-5439/5440 unknown.....
Melchior Timmers
Editor Scramble Magazine
-----------------------------------------
PO Box 75545
1118 ZN Schiphol
The Netherlands
E-mail: melchior.timmers@scramble.nl
Internet: http://www.scramble.nl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Editor Scramble Magazine
-----------------------------------------
PO Box 75545
1118 ZN Schiphol
The Netherlands
E-mail: melchior.timmers@scramble.nl
Internet: http://www.scramble.nl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
Can only mean one thing (I guess). It was reported before that AF-275/AF-277 were also a part of Lot 12 (so 18-5446/18-5448). It was also reported earlier that the Danish aircraft are Lot 13 which means the allocations for the Japanese scroll up. But then still 1 airframe 'double', so this can only mean there's only one Italian airframe (AL-13) foreseen in Lot 12.Melchior Timmers wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 12:00 AF-275 is the next in sequence..... Also,the FY 18-54xx is till in doubt. Some mention AX-17/22 are 18-5441/5448 but that obvious is not correct.
Others mention AL-13/14 being 18-5441/18-5442, but that leaves 18-5439/5440 unknown.....
Greets,
Bjorn Claes
F-16.net editor/photo library admin/serials database admin
F-16.net editor/photo library admin/serials database admin
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
First flights today, Feb 22, 2021.
AU-34 as A35-034
AS-26 as 941 (18-5437).
Tally.
AU-34 as A35-034
AS-26 as 941 (18-5437).
Tally.
-
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 406
- Joined: 02 Sep 2005, 14:50
- Subscriber Scramble: Y85
- Location: Rotterdam
- Contact:
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
DOD / USN Naval Air Systems Command procurement contract mentions:Bjorn wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 19:02Can only mean one thing (I guess). It was reported before that AF-275/AF-277 were also a part of Lot 12 (so 18-5446/18-5448). It was also reported earlier that the Danish aircraft are Lot 13 which means the allocations for the Japanese scroll up. But then still 1 airframe 'double', so this can only mean there's only one Italian airframe (AL-13) foreseen in Lot 12.Melchior Timmers wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 12:00 AF-275 is the next in sequence..... Also,the FY 18-54xx is till in doubt. Some mention AX-17/22 are 18-5441/5448 but that obvious is not correct.
Others mention AL-13/14 being 18-5441/18-5442, but that leaves 18-5439/5440 unknown.....
Greets,
Lot 12 RDAF 2 AMI 2 / Marina 1 Which could be AL-13/AL-14 and BL-3
Lot 13 RDAF 4 AMI 2 / Marina 3 Which should be AL-15/L-16 and BL-4 (mentioned as BuNo 169701) and BL-5/BL-6
Lot 14 RDAF 8 AMI 4 / Marina 5
So RDAF AP-01 (18-5439) AP-02 (18-5440) could be correct if they are to be included & delivered within Lot 12; AP-01 rolled out 13JAN21
Last edited by Worldnis on 25 Feb 2021, 00:34, edited 1 time in total.
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
Still a lot of speculations. I already made some alterations to the data I posted above. But I'm not going to post it yet since it is preliminary. Let us wait a couple of weeks for some new info to arrive. In the course of March the last Lot 12 jets should be making their first flights and Lot 13 aircraft are already making theirs (Australian A35-034 as Tally mentioned), so it should become clear then what the final setup will be.
Greets,
Greets,
Bjorn Claes
F-16.net editor/photo library admin/serials database admin
F-16.net editor/photo library admin/serials database admin
- Starfighter_F-104G
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: 05 May 2012, 17:13
- Type of spotter: serial
- Subscriber Scramble: no
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
[/quote]
DOD / USN Naval Air Systems Command procurement contract mentions:
Lot 13 RDAF 4 AMI 2 / Marina 3 Which should be AL-15/L-16 and BL-4 (mentioned as BuNo 169701) and BL-5/BL-6
Lot 14 RDAF 8 AMI 4 / Marina 5
[/quote]
AMI / Marina numbers for LOT 13 & 14 are completely WRONG
DOD / USN Naval Air Systems Command procurement contract mentions:
Lot 13 RDAF 4 AMI 2 / Marina 3 Which should be AL-15/L-16 and BL-4 (mentioned as BuNo 169701) and BL-5/BL-6
Lot 14 RDAF 8 AMI 4 / Marina 5
[/quote]
AMI / Marina numbers for LOT 13 & 14 are completely WRONG
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
AP-01 has not flown yet.
Regards
Mark
Regards
Mark
Worldnis wrote: ↑24 Feb 2021, 00:19DOD / USN Naval Air Systems Command procurement contract mentions:Bjorn wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 19:02Can only mean one thing (I guess). It was reported before that AF-275/AF-277 were also a part of Lot 12 (so 18-5446/18-5448). It was also reported earlier that the Danish aircraft are Lot 13 which means the allocations for the Japanese scroll up. But then still 1 airframe 'double', so this can only mean there's only one Italian airframe (AL-13) foreseen in Lot 12.Melchior Timmers wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 12:00 AF-275 is the next in sequence..... Also,the FY 18-54xx is till in doubt. Some mention AX-17/22 are 18-5441/5448 but that obvious is not correct.
Others mention AL-13/14 being 18-5441/18-5442, but that leaves 18-5439/5440 unknown.....
Greets,
Lot 12 RDAF 2 AMI 2 / Marina 1 Which could be AL-13/AL-14 and BL-3
Lot 13 RDAF 4 AMI 2 / Marina 3 Which should be AL-15/L-16 and BL-4 (mentioned as BuNo 169701) and BL-5/BL-6
Lot 14 RDAF 8 AMI 4 / Marina 5
So RDAF AP-01 (18-5439) AP-02 (18-5440) could be correct if they are to be included & delivered within Lot 12, and AP-01 already flying in 09/20
-
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 406
- Joined: 02 Sep 2005, 14:50
- Subscriber Scramble: Y85
- Location: Rotterdam
- Contact:
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
DOD / USN Naval Air Systems Command procurement contract mentions:
Lot 13 RDAF 4 AMI 2 / Marina 3 Which should be AL-15/L-16 and BL-4 (mentioned as BuNo 169701) and BL-5/BL-6
Lot 14 RDAF 8 AMI 4 / Marina 5
[/quote]
AMI / Marina numbers for LOT 13 & 14 are completely WRONG
[/quote]
Thank you for your helpful insights
Re: F-35 Lightning II developments
First flight F-35A AF-275 18-5447/WA destined for the 6 WPS, Feb 24, 2021.
Tally.
Tally.