Amsterdam EHAM 12-08-2011

[wild weasel]

Thanks guys, glad you appreciate them.......

@ Tomba: indeed it seems the TC works okay.....and concerning Andras, i agree, he should come more often. Next time we'll even take the barbecue

[Andras]

Very nice work all, had a great few hours with you guys, your shots look very good Menno, tip top..! I'll try and come more often, 8 months is too much of a rest period..hahaha! I'll post a few later if i can find any good ones Thanks for the company!

[Pancake]

Very nice set of pictures, gentleman. !
I like the style of 14 & 15, from Menno.
Regards,
Johan

[Bendavid2]

I was also at AMS for a nice sunrise. Since the forecast was bad, I just gave it a try. I was out there to suprise the girlfriend of my little brother.

I also met Tyno (from Holland). We where at the same point at the polderbaan. So some fewer pictures than normal.

1.

SPL7 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr
2.

SPL1 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr
3. I heared something about that the contract of this plane won´t be extend......

SPL4 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr
4. And as a suprise the girlfriend came with a 757-300!

SPL5 by davidvanwoerkom, on Flickr

[wild weasel]

Very nice work all, had a great few hours with you guys, your shots look very good Menno, tip top..! I'll try and come more often, 8 months is too much of a rest period..hahaha! I'll post a few later if i can find any good ones Thanks for the company!

Thanks Johan, thought i might try something different.......

@ Andras: Cheers mate, TC does it well so far, curious what it will do without all those iritating heatwaves . You should come with us more often indeed, is good fun and joy! hope to see you see soon again...

Menno

[Andras]

Ok, here a few shots of last Friday. Tested the 7D with the 400mm 5.6 and a few shots with a 20-35mm 2.8 The 3200 ISO shots surprised me although i do not think it is very usefull.

@ Menno, hope i can go more often, but we will have to see...

1.


2. Only the left wingtip is sharp


3. 3 ship..


4.


5.


6.


7. Arty edit


8.


9.


10. Super twinkle


11.


12.


13. 1/50 panning shot, non IS 400mm, backlit, just handheld


14. 20-35mm 2.8 lens used here


15. The 3200 ISO shot, i think it sucks ;-/ Haven't shot a lot at night so i think this could be far better... What do you guys think?


Feel free to comment please..

[wild weasel]

Some nice panning shots buddy, certainly considering the EXIF

I like the MD-11 shot too by the way...

[tomba2247]

Nice shots Andras,, funny post on the panning shot
nr4 is my winner!! well done.

[Andras]

TY, preciate it...

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[wild weasel]

TY, preciate it...

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Well, as far as my knowledge goes (and i have to be carefull now, cause you really have loads of knowledge considering PP), i say yes, S RAW will not give you the full amount of "space" compared to a full size RAW file, but i might be totally wrong here, so please correct me if i'm wrong....

[Andras]

TY, preciate it...

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Well, as far as my knowledge goes (and i have to be carefull now, cause you really have loads of knowledge considering PP), i say yes, S RAW will not give you the full amount of "space" compared to a full size RAW file, but i might be totally wrong here, so please correct me if i'm wrong....

Hahaha, that's too much credit, dunno if it's true so correcting you is impossible without the knowing

But, my guess is leaning towards your answer too.. I thought about it the last few days and I have to test it out, so Friday evening will be test evening again.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[wild weasel]

TY, preciate it...

Now I have a question which I can't seem to figure out. I shot all these in S-Raw so that means 10mpx Raw files instead of 18.x. Does the noise show up faster now because I'm not shooting full reso? My answer would be yes, I have the same picture covering the same amount of frame, only less pix so I see it turn up more than with the full reso used. Is this correct?

So, I should only shoot full RAW to have more quality? Who can throw some light on this..

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Well, as far as my knowledge goes (and i have to be carefull now, cause you really have loads of knowledge considering PP), i say yes, S RAW will not give you the full amount of "space" compared to a full size RAW file, but i might be totally wrong here, so please correct me if i'm wrong....

Hahaha, that's too much credit, dunno if it's true so correcting you is impossible without the knowing

But, my guess is leaning towards your answer too.. I thought about it the last few days and I have to test it out, so Friday evening will be test evening again.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

That's nice, count me in