http://yfrog.com/gy98ygej
and
http://avherald.com/h?article=4360264d&opt=0 for the photos...
More info:
http://aviation-safety.net/database/rec ... 20110110-0
and
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... rport.html
PICTURES: AirAsia A320 on its nose after runway overrun...
Moderator: gatso76
Forum rules
- Stratofreighter
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 22247
- Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
- Location: Netherlands
PICTURES: AirAsia A320 on its nose after runway overrun...
December 2024 updates at FokkerNews.nl....
Re: PICTURES: AirAsia A320 on its nose after runway overrun...
From the AvHerald-article:
I am just wondering if there is any further structural damage, as it went off the runway very soon after landing (and as such at high-speed), as these taxiways are, when looking at the map-details, closest to the pianos of runway 25. If so, it is also nothing short of a miracle no one got seriously hurt from the 'sudden' stop.
Good luck digging it out!
Kees
Yeah right! Just look at the pictures; it was the mud which brought the plane to a stop, not the captain.The captain managed to bring the aircraft to a safe stop after the airplane veered off the runway, all passengers were evacuated thereafter as a precaution in line with the company's standard operating procedures.
I am just wondering if there is any further structural damage, as it went off the runway very soon after landing (and as such at high-speed), as these taxiways are, when looking at the map-details, closest to the pianos of runway 25. If so, it is also nothing short of a miracle no one got seriously hurt from the 'sudden' stop.
Good luck digging it out!
Kees
- flying_kiwi
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 5451
- Joined: 10 Nov 2004, 14:33
- Location: Either EHEH, NZTA, or enroute
- Contact:
Re: PICTURES: AirAsia A320 on its nose after runway overrun...
Quick measurement in Google Earth shows that the aircraft came to a halt in between 900 and 1100m (depending on where in the touchdown zone it landed). That should be enough considering the JAR landing field length (actual distance divided by 0.6) at MLW and sea level is approx 1250m.Optimus wrote:I am just wondering if there is any further structural damage, as it went off the runway very soon after landing (and as such at high-speed), as these taxiways are, when looking at the map-details, closest to the pianos of runway 25. If so, it is also nothing short of a miracle no one got seriously hurt from the 'sudden' stop.
Already doneOptimus wrote:Good luck digging it out!
The NOTAMS regarding the runway being closed except for departures has been withdrawn.
- Rene Klok
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 486
- Joined: 04 May 2006, 10:49
- Subscriber Scramble: Ja
- Location: In a galaxy far far away
Re: PICTURES: AirAsia A320 on its nose after runway overrun...
The Air Asia slogan: ''anyone can fly'' is fit for an update: ''but not anyone can land''.
Re: PICTURES: AirAsia A320 on its nose after runway overrun...
Hm, in that case there was more length available than I initially thought there was, and for the second remark; luck was certainly on their side for getting it out of the way so fast![quote="flying_kiwiQuick measurement in Google Earth shows that the aircraft came to a halt in between 900 and 1100m (depending on where in the touchdown zone it landed). That should be enough considering the JAR landing field length (actual distance divided by 0.6) at MLW and sea level is approx 1250m.
Already doneOptimus wrote:Good luck digging it out!
The NOTAMS regarding the runway being closed except for departures has been withdrawn.
As a side note: on all 12 flights I enjoyed so far with Air Asia, we were indeed always brought us to a safe and proper stop
Kees