ETAD 03-09-2010
Forum rules
![]() | Mode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary |
- Nielis
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 624
- Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
- Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
- Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
- Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
- Contact:
ETAD 03-09-2010
Did some spotting today at SPM. I was there between 8.15LT-16.35LT.
The following F-16 flew a mission from 8.30 until 14.00. They probably made a diversion to ETAR in this time frame because until 12.00 the cloud base was only 200ft and there was some very heavy fog.
F-16CJ:
92-0918
90-0828
91-0344
91-0403
96-0080
96-0083
91-0360
91-0343
91-0402
91-0366
There were five C-17 at the platform:
02-1112
07-7173 departed around 13.45
07-7176
07-7169
Unknown C-17 departed around 13.00
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
The following F-16 flew a mission from 8.30 until 14.00. They probably made a diversion to ETAR in this time frame because until 12.00 the cloud base was only 200ft and there was some very heavy fog.
F-16CJ:
92-0918
90-0828
91-0344
91-0403
96-0080
96-0083
91-0360
91-0343
91-0402
91-0366
There were five C-17 at the platform:
02-1112
07-7173 departed around 13.45
07-7176
07-7169
Unknown C-17 departed around 13.00
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Last edited by Nielis on 04 Sep 2010, 11:41, edited 3 times in total.
- r.e.hendriks
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2514
- Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 12:05
- Type of spotter: fly-by.nl
- Subscriber Scramble: 1990>
- Location: Uden, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: ETAR 03-09-2010
You should probably change the title, because ETAR is the location identifier of Ramstein. ETAD = Spangdahlem.
Best regards Rob.
Best regards Rob.
- Nielis
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 624
- Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
- Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
- Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
- Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: ETAR 03-09-2010
Sorry I made a typo. It was very early this morning
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
De andere C-17 is de 90-0533/HH. Ik was er tussen 11:00 en 11:25 en vond het al verdacht rustig. Op dat moment scheen het zonnetje mooi maar helaas geen enkele vliegbeweging
- Nielis
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 624
- Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
- Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
- Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
- Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
Zou dit dan niet de 00-0533 moeten zijn?, want volgens mij zijn er geen C-17's in het VY90 gebouwdmarco70 wrote:De andere C-17 is de 90-0533/HH. Ik was er tussen 11:00 en 11:25 en vond het al verdacht rustig. Op dat moment scheen het zonnetje mooi maar helaas geen enkele vliegbeweging
-
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 937
- Joined: 23 Sep 2002, 00:02
- Type of spotter: Een die naar vliegtuigen kiekt
- Location: EHTW
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
90-0533 is wel degelijk goed. (90-0532 t/m 90-0535)
FY 00 kisten zijn 00-0172 t/m 00-0185.
Ow en 92-0918 moet zijn 92-3918![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
FY 00 kisten zijn 00-0172 t/m 00-0185.
Ow en 92-0918 moet zijn 92-3918
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
- K-9
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: 04 Oct 2004, 16:49
- Type of spotter: military
- Location: Leiderdorp
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
/HH in 90-0533/HH ? HH code is only allocated to 8 fy 05 C-17's isn't it ?
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
Believe this one was transfered to 15WG some months agoK-9 wrote:/HH in 90-0533/HH ? HH code is only allocated to 8 fy 05 C-17's isn't it ?
- Nielis
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 624
- Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
- Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
- Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
- Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
thanks everybody for the corrections didn't know that there were any C-17's build in 1990
- Nielis
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 624
- Joined: 22 Dec 2007, 12:22
- Type of spotter: Photo's and Serials
- Subscriber Scramble: Nielis
- Location: Lienden, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
Here is some additional information about the F-16CJ that flew that:
92-3918 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
90-0828 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0344 Blue/Red Tailband Stingers
91-0403 Red/Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
96-0080 Red Tailband Warhawks
96-0083 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0360 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0343 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0402 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0366 Red Tailband Warhawks
I hope this is the information were you been looking for Joris
Nielis
92-3918 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
90-0828 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0344 Blue/Red Tailband Stingers
91-0403 Red/Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
96-0080 Red Tailband Warhawks
96-0083 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0360 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0343 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0402 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0366 Red Tailband Warhawks
I hope this is the information were you been looking for Joris
Nielis
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
100% of the code HH. It's on photo
-
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 313
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 14:18
- Subscriber Scramble: Joris Heeren
Re: ETAD 03-09-2010
Yep, that is exactly the info I was looking for, thanks a lot!Nielis wrote:Here is some additional information about the F-16CJ that flew that:
92-3918 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
90-0828 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0344 Blue/Red Tailband Stingers
91-0403 Red/Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
96-0080 Red Tailband Warhawks
96-0083 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0360 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0343 Red Tailband Stingers
91-0402 Blue Tailband Fighting Hawks
91-0366 Red Tailband Warhawks
I hope this is the information were you been looking for Joris
Joris