1.
Photo Photobucket Jpeg:
2.
Photo ImageShack Jpeg:
3.
Photo ImageShack Tiff/pgn:
1.1
Photoresizing Photobucket Jpeg:
1.2
Photoresizing ImageShack Jpeg:
1.3
Own Photoresizing ImageShack Tiff/pgn:
2.1
Own Photoresizing ImageSchack Jpeg:
2.2
Own Photoresizing ImageSchack Tiff/pgn:
greetings Reinold
Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
Forum rules
- Reinold
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 203
- Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 10:59
- Subscriber Scramble: Reinold
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
Last edited by Reinold on 16 May 2010, 16:28, edited 2 times in total.
- Polecat
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: 12 Jul 2007, 13:58
- Type of spotter: Omnivore
- Subscriber Scramble: Polecat
- Location: The Middle East of The Netherlands
Re: Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
ik neem aan dat ie eens wilde testen of er kwaliteitsverschil tussen de verschillende sites zit, en heel eerlijkgezegd zie ik niet erg veel verschil.....
I have never drunk milk, and I never will . . . .
- Reinold
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 203
- Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 10:59
- Subscriber Scramble: Reinold
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
Ik zie ook weinig verschil. Zelfs niet in de verschillende soorten bestanden.
ImageShack geeft wel de mogelijkheid op Tiff bestanden te uploaden, daar waar Photobucket dat niet kan.
Wel zie je onder de eigenschappen van de foto dat de grootte zichtbaar is bij de foto's van ImageShack.
Ook zie je dan dat de de Tiff foto een keer zoveel bytes heeft. Logisch i.p.v. 8bitt nu 16 Bitt.
I see little difference. Even in the different types of files.
ImageShack gives the possibility to upload files to Tiff, where Photobucket can not.
Also you can see below the properties of the image that the size is visible in the photographs of ImageShack.
Also you can see that the Tiff image has twice the size of bytes. Logical in stead of 8bitt now 16 Bitt.
ImageShack geeft wel de mogelijkheid op Tiff bestanden te uploaden, daar waar Photobucket dat niet kan.
Wel zie je onder de eigenschappen van de foto dat de grootte zichtbaar is bij de foto's van ImageShack.
Ook zie je dan dat de de Tiff foto een keer zoveel bytes heeft. Logisch i.p.v. 8bitt nu 16 Bitt.
I see little difference. Even in the different types of files.
ImageShack gives the possibility to upload files to Tiff, where Photobucket can not.
Also you can see below the properties of the image that the size is visible in the photographs of ImageShack.
Also you can see that the Tiff image has twice the size of bytes. Logical in stead of 8bitt now 16 Bitt.
- Sven van Roij
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 578
- Joined: 01 Apr 2008, 20:18
- Type of spotter: Military & Helo's
- Subscriber Scramble: Sven van Roij
- Contact:
Re: Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
Check out the tail code on 2.1 and 2.2: I clearly see the difference in sharpness! Tnx for this test, I always upload my pics in JPEG, not anymore now!
Regards,
Sven
Regards,
Sven
- Reinold
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 203
- Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 10:59
- Subscriber Scramble: Reinold
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
That's right Sven, that's the one I last added on the test and is clearly visible.
But no major differences in quality between Photobucket and ImageShack.
greetings Reinold
But no major differences in quality between Photobucket and ImageShack.
greetings Reinold
- Boudewijn van Oirschot
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2746
- Joined: 16 Feb 2007, 18:16
- Type of spotter: Wat niet?
- Subscriber Scramble: Boudewijn van Oirschot
- Location: Tilburg, NB
Re: Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
I noticed a very small, but still visible difference between 1.2 and 1.3.
If you open the picture in either Lightroom or Microsoft Paint and you cut a small part of the engine intake of 1.3 and you paste it on 1.2, it becomes clearly visible that 1.3 is a bit brighter.
Sample (pasted part of 1.3 is not equal to 1.2, I've done it too fast ) but still:
If you open the picture in either Lightroom or Microsoft Paint and you cut a small part of the engine intake of 1.3 and you paste it on 1.2, it becomes clearly visible that 1.3 is a bit brighter.
Sample (pasted part of 1.3 is not equal to 1.2, I've done it too fast ) but still:
- amarx
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 789
- Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 14:16
- Subscriber Scramble: amarx
- Location: soest
- Contact:
Re: Test page uploading Photobucket/ImageShack->Jpeg/Tiff
You can also see it the colors by the canopy.
2.1 are the dark gray color darker than the photo from 2.2.
2.1 are the dark gray color darker than the photo from 2.2.