Spangdahlem (ETAD/SPM) - 2008

Eric van Lisdonk · Post by **Eric van Lisdonk** » 10 Feb 2008, 13:30

And the tails are?????????????

Cheers,
Eric

Reaper · Post by **Reaper** » 11 Feb 2008, 15:30

Tail usually can be found on the backside of the aircraft, F-16 got one, A-10 got two....

Sorry, couldn't resist...

perrie · Post by **perrie** » 12 Feb 2008, 17:04

Anyone for the A-10 deployment currently in Balad??
Are those a/c known?

Per

USAFE · Post by **USAFE** » 12 Feb 2008, 18:42

281 + 985 are in spang. photographed them yesterday.

Brian · Post by **Brian** » 12 Feb 2008, 19:03

at least these are:

82-0649 on Jan 04
81-0963 on Jan 04
81-0945 on Jan 03
81-0952 <--- edited
81-0954 on Jan 07
81-0976 on Jan 04
81-0980 on Jan 04
81-0983 <--- edited
81-0984 on Jan 05
81-0992 on Jan 04

there a couple more, but i can't recollect them..

greets Brian

Post by **Key** » 12 Feb 2008, 20:26

J.J. wrote:The 81st EFS is currently deployed for OEF to Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, and not for OIF to Balad AB, Iraq!

Already verified by official USAF photos taken at Bagram are 81-0983 (first shot) and 81-0952 (second shot). The jet at left on the third shot looks to me like 81-0963 - also posted by Brian. There should be deployed at least ten Hogs or a full USAF strike fighter / attack aircraft EFS package of twelve jets (like F-16C units at Balad and F-15E units at Bagram).

According rule C.10. here and the rules here, the photos have been moved here!

Erik

J.J. · Post by **J.J.** » 12 Feb 2008, 21:02

Thanks for secured photo moving, Erik! And sorry! I´m new to "Scramble", comming from F-16.net. On our forums we can post pictures in every reply, they are only "downsized" by measurements to fit the website´s standard frame width. And in some cases a single picture says more as ten to hundred words... Now, your own "Scramble" rules are some more familiar to me and I will respect that for the future.

Post by **Key** » 12 Feb 2008, 22:06

J.J., no worries. The rules on photos are complex here. This has grown over time due to users' wishes. We hope to implement a change some time this year, when hopefully switching to other software. Until then, we ask for everybody's co-operation, which is generally going very well.

Thx,
Erik

J.J. · Post by **J.J.** » 12 Feb 2008, 22:21

Thanks for your helpful inside view, Erik! But please understand, before I joined "Scramble" I was only familiary with standards like:

http://www.f-16.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.f-15estrikeeagle.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://http://www.a-10.org/phpbb2/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (Warthog Territory Forums)

Regards!
Joachim Jacob (J.J.)

wapo84 · Post by **wapo84** » 13 Feb 2008, 16:38

CUBE71 LICZ ETAD 4F16 91-0418

Maurizio · Post by **Maurizio** » 13 Feb 2008, 18:20

CUBE71 LICZ ETAD 4F16 91-0418

Probabily are those landed at Aviano today, 1 22FS 3 23FS, sorry no serials yet, they are night-stopping.

J.J. · Post by **J.J.** » 13 Feb 2008, 19:29

Today, the following brand-new USAF photo was released on the public website of the 455th AEW, Bagram AB, Afghanistan:

http://www.bagram.afnews.af.mil/shared/ ... 8L-032.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It looks to me more like A-10 81-0976/SP than 81-0978 (already posted by Brian). What´s your opinion? Anybody with falcon eyes?

Phantom54 · Post by **Phantom54** » 13 Feb 2008, 20:19

I think it's time to search for a new photographer

Post by **Key** » 13 Feb 2008, 20:22

Agree with both of you!

Erik

USAFE · Post by **USAFE** » 13 Feb 2008, 20:36

Phantom54 wrote:I think it's time to search for a new photographer

Here are the exifs:

Make - NIKON CORPORATION
Model - NIKON D2Xs
ExposureTime - 1/125 seconds
FNumber - 13.00

Scramble Messageboard

Spangdahlem (ETAD/SPM) - 2008

13/02