Zijn er mensen die in het bezit zijn van deze lens en mij kunnen vertellen hoe goed(of slecht) dit objectief is ??
Ben zeer benieuwd.
Kier
Canon EF24-105mm F4.0L IS USM
Forum rules
  |
-
E. Schoonderwoerd
- Scramble Rookie
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 13 Mar 2003, 19:42
- Subscriber Scramble: E. Schoonderwoerd
24-105
Personally I've got good experiences/results with the 24-105 mm. I use it on a 1DII and a 30D. I prefer using it on the 1D because this one is (and always will) superior to the 30D. All about sensorsize, AF-speed etc.
The AF-speed (or better USM) of the 24-105 works perfect as you can see from the shots enclosed, especially the both F-18's. I like the constant aperture of F. 4.0 and allthough not always needed I also like the Image Stabilizer. An expensive lens but for me one which will accompany me for a lots of years ahead.
Emile
The AF-speed (or better USM) of the 24-105 works perfect as you can see from the shots enclosed, especially the both F-18's. I like the constant aperture of F. 4.0 and allthough not always needed I also like the Image Stabilizer. An expensive lens but for me one which will accompany me for a lots of years ahead.
Emile
-
wvanbel
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 473
- Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 19:46
- Type of spotter: F4, mostly military stuff...
- Subscriber Scramble: Yes
- Location: Itegem, Belgium
- Contact:
Indeed great pictures!! It would be nice if someone could explain the "how to get" a carrier ride!SquAdmin wrote:Wow, great pictures! I gotta get myself a carrier ride too someday...
Although I have heard also good remarks about the lens, for some, it does not offer "all" what could be expected from a "L"-type lens. I have heard stories that the IS does not work correctly when in "unusual attitudes" (i.e. pointing straight up and/or down, e.g. while manouvering during aerobatics - although it is not applicable for most, it is good to know the limitations of the IS).
Personally, I have opted for the much cheaper EF28-105 f/3.5-4.5 II USM (yes, it lacks IS, but it also comes much cheaper, while the optics are quite good).
PS: It all depends for what (and how much) you will use it, and how much you want to spend...
Best regards,
Walter
-
nilsko
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 14:53
- Type of spotter: F2
- Subscriber Scramble: No
- Location: Doorn
Contacts, contacts, contacts, hard work getting material published, hard work, contacts and a little bit of luck.wvanbel wrote: Indeed great pictures!! It would be nice if someone could explain the "how to get" a carrier ride!
At least that's what I heard first hand from someone who had the privilege to visit a carrier..-
canberra
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1710
- Joined: 01 Dec 2004, 16:57
- Type of spotter: not too bad
- Location: The Hague
Re: 24-105
Don't know if I am doing something wrong but I often get soft/unsharp photos in the 50-105mm range. Especially when using spotmetering. AnyoneE. Schoonderwoerd wrote:Personally I've got good experiences/results with the 24-105 mm.
edit: Should maybe add I use it on a EOS 20D...
/Michael
-
E. Schoonderwoerd
- Scramble Rookie
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 13 Mar 2003, 19:42
- Subscriber Scramble: E. Schoonderwoerd