Are these two touching or not?!?!

ImageDedicated forum to share your own recent photos with the rest of the community.
Please note large files may exist here before you start browsing!

Forum rules
ImageThis is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum.
Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post.
In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.).

Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so.
Post Reply
User avatar
Hans.Jacobs
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 146
Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 09:10
Subscriber Scramble: Hans Jacobs
Location: Singapore

Are these two touching or not?!?!

Post by Hans.Jacobs »

hi Guys,

not sure if my eyes are fooling me, but these two Roulettes seem to be touching each other:

Image

sorry for the bad picture quality, but here's a closeup of the action. Seriously think the chaseplane is pushing down the tailplane of the inverted aircraft....

Image

The tailplane of the inverted aircraft seems to be underneath the engine cover of the chaseplane. The angle of the inverted plane is also a bit strange compared to the other one... What do you think?

best regards,
Hans.
Top
User avatar
Wijgert IJlst
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2189
Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 08:57
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: Wijgert IJlst

Post by Wijgert IJlst »

:roll: Perhaps thats the reason why the propellor does not seem to rotate... :shock:

Sigh... think your eyes are fooling you! :?
Kind Regards / Groeten,

Wijgert IJlst
Top
maaspotter
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 330
Joined: 17 Sep 2003, 18:17
Location: beek
Contact:
Contact maaspotter

Post by maaspotter »

Wijgert IJlst wrote:Sigh... think your eyes are fooling you! :?
This one looks like a real "hit"

Look carefully,
The rotor from the top-one is in front of the inverted aircraft...
The tailfin of the inverted one is in front of the top one...

i.o.w. --> it looks like a very lucky pilot (that the rotor didn't hit the inverted aircraft)

rgds, Rob
Top
User avatar
kiwi
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1473
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 22:24
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:
Contact kiwi

Post by kiwi »

The angle of the front plane isn't an indication that he is being pushed down. Upside-down flight means extra nose down (in upside-down that's nose up :P) attitude because the wings are asymmetrical (top and bottom). They are shaped to cause optimum lift when the top side is up.

However it really looks like they're touching eachother
Top
User avatar
evhest
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1660
Joined: 04 Jul 2004, 16:37

Post by evhest »

Definitely not touching, if you ask me. It think is is an optical illusion, cause by the traling edge of the horizontal stabilizer being perfecty lined up with a line beneath the fuselage of the other one. You can see the same line (presumably caused by the gear doors ot something) on the third plane.

Also, making contact like this would have absoluty caused a crash and this apparantly did not happen.
Answers will be questioned.....
Top
User avatar
Leeuwarden
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1053
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 10:53
Location: Leeuwarden

Post by Leeuwarden »

Did you send the picture to them? Maybe they would like to respond...
Top
Brian
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 937
Joined: 23 Sep 2002, 00:02
Type of spotter: Een die naar vliegtuigen kiekt
Location: EHTW

Post by Brian »

i think the front plane's tail is behind the nose of the chasing plane and causes an optical illusion. IF the planes where hitting eachother, the chaseplane would definatly crash because the propellor would hit the fuselage of the front plane.

Due to the angle of the picture you might think there hitting eachother, but in reality it could be that there is a spacing of a couple of meters between them.

just my thoughts..

Cheers Brian
Top
User avatar
Jetzone 2000
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 235
Joined: 24 May 2005, 16:27

Post by Jetzone 2000 »

I still remember an air-to-air picture on the cover of AFM form 1990 where one East German Su-22 alsmost touched the fuselage of an other one with his wing.
Kind Regards,

Andries
http://www.jetzone2000.com
Top
maaspotter
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 330
Joined: 17 Sep 2003, 18:17
Location: beek
Contact:
Contact maaspotter

Post by maaspotter »

Used a bit of shadow/highlight in photoshop to make it more clear... I'm still not convinced, cause it looks like you can see the shade of the inverted one, on the belly of the chaseplane...

Image

They could hit each other without crashing (the stabilizer is longer as a propellorblade), but as I said before, they were lucky if this happened... See the illustration below:

Image

rgds, rob
Top
User avatar
P.Terlouw
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 943
Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 11:22
Subscriber Scramble: P.Terlouw
Location: Soesterberg
Contact:
Contact P.Terlouw

Post by P.Terlouw »

I also don't believe they touch but I think the guy who took the picture should know. He was there and saw what happened after he took the shot. If they seperate for a moment, regroup or even aborted the display you know enough. I can not imagine they would continu the display after they touched.
Top
User avatar
thomaster
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 115
Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 22:16
Location: Hoofddorp

Post by thomaster »

evhest wrote:Definitely not touching, if you ask me. It think is is an optical illusion, cause by the traling edge of the horizontal stabilizer being perfecty lined up with a line beneath the fuselage of the other one. You can see the same line (presumably caused by the gear doors ot something) on the third plane.

Also, making contact like this would have absoluty caused a crash and this apparantly did not happen.
Totally agree with you there:
Image
Bandits, 2o'clock!
Its 1:30-what'll I do til then?
Top
Brian
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 937
Joined: 23 Sep 2002, 00:02
Type of spotter: Een die naar vliegtuigen kiekt
Location: EHTW

Post by Brian »

I agree with the above.. And the fact that IF there touching.. the front plane looses control of it's tail elevator and can't move op nor down.
Top
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11251
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Re: Are these two touching or not?!?!

Post by Key »

Hanz wrote:these two Roulettes seem to be touching each other
As was to be expected, they are not. But it's a very good illusion!
I took the liberty of editing your photo. What I think Elmer and thomaster mean becomes visible with an overlay of the third planes' nose on the closest one. Some detail of the fuselage under the engine lines up exactly with the inverted one's stabilo and elevator, creating the impression the stabilo is under the nose. Actually, the inverted one is to the left (looking in flight direction) of the closest one, and a bit higher.
Nice lesson for interpretation of 'photo proof' :!:

Image

Erik
Climb to 20ft, we're leaving a dust trail
Top
User avatar
Hans.Jacobs
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 146
Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 09:10
Subscriber Scramble: Hans Jacobs
Location: Singapore

Post by Hans.Jacobs »

hi Erik,

you got me convinced now, but damn, they are flying close to each other, and what a coincidence these lines are so nicely aligned...

Best regards,
Hans.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Photo Forum”