1411CBennie wrote:Half an hour to go and not showing on radar yet... 13:51 will be very (too?) tight!T7 wrote:No, not visible as aircraft is non-ADS-B.Derice wrote:Will it be visible on FR24?
Arrival on blocks now set on 1351lt..
EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Moderator: gatso76
Forum rules
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Rgds,Martin.
- Derice
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: 24 Dec 2007, 14:12
- Type of spotter: F3
- Subscriber Scramble: Derice
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Runway exp?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
- Bennie
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 16541
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
- Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
- Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
- Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Now showing 40NM East of Munster!
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Visual vanaf de polderbaan
-
- Scramble Newbie
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 01:06
- Type of spotter: Photospotter :-)
- Location: Hoofddorp/EHAM
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Got it !!! Thanks for the updates all the way.
In around 1415... At the blocks 10 minutes after. So ETD is around 1625? (2h after arrival, as mentioned earlier)
Exp rwy for T/O is 24? Anyone who can confirm this? Thanks
NustyR, we zagen je rijden, maar waar ging jij in vredesnaam naartoe? Ik reken op pics
edit: corrected some typo's in the timings
In around 1415... At the blocks 10 minutes after. So ETD is around 1625? (2h after arrival, as mentioned earlier)
Exp rwy for T/O is 24? Anyone who can confirm this? Thanks
NustyR, we zagen je rijden, maar waar ging jij in vredesnaam naartoe? Ik reken op pics
edit: corrected some typo's in the timings
Last edited by gulf_5 on 02 Jul 2012, 15:31, edited 1 time in total.
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Ze moet richting de UK, als 18L ook open is krijgt ze nog steeds 24.gulf_5 wrote: Exp rwy for T/O is 24? Anyone who can confirm this? Thanks
Fietspad Polderbaan, dan had ik de zon aan e goede kant. Overigens geldt dit ook voor de heathazegulf_5 wrote:
NustyR, we zagen je rijden, maar waar ging jij in vredesnaam naartoe? Ik reken op pics
- Bennie
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 16541
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
- Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
- Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
- Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
She'll be departing from RWY24 shortly!
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
- Piet Luijken
- Moderator
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: 27 Dec 2003, 14:19
- Subscriber Scramble: Piet Luijken
- Location: Amstelveen
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
Just to be sure, ZD953 visual IDed.
Thanks for all the info, guys!
Thanks for all the info, guys!
Greetings,
Piet Luijken
Scramble Editor
Piet Luijken
Scramble Editor
- RobertMB
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 920
- Joined: 28 Aug 2004, 12:44
- Subscriber Scramble: RobertMB
- Location: Groningen
Re: EHAM 02-07-2012 MIL
ZD953... Fantastic, what beauty !
Well I'll try to explain what "the problem" is of aircraft look like playing hide and seek at SBS/Airnav boxes (or at our PC screens, e.g. FR24)
Yes, visible as ZD953 is Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast equipped (as part of its Certificate of Military Registration) and still using ICAO 24-bit address "Mode S (Selective) hex-code" 43C1C4 !
But NOT visible as the coupled database, in this case of FR24, isn't up to date.... An SBS/AirNav box is only a receiver of a transmitterresponder signal (simply said: one way signaltraffic from the transponder to the box) and can't interrogate and respond like a Secondary Surveillance Radar system (that has, simply said: 2-way "ask and answer" signaltraffic between SSR and ransponder).
So an SBS/AirNav box needs a transponder with a coupled GPS (of course) AND a database of ICAO 24-bit adresses as reference. The box can't place the "blip" without GPS on your screen (as I said before, can't interrogate). When the SBS/AirnNav box "knows" to place the "blip" (with the help of GPS) on your screen it's just a peace of cake to "check" its coupled database immediately and able to translate the received data signal part of the transponder 's unique ICAO 24-bit address and "the messagetag" appears at your box (or PC) screen
Another issue: when flightcrew is entering wrong flight identity into their Mode S transponder it leads to "misscommunication" between Mode S / SSR (and the possibility of problems when ATC/ACC/UAC's receiving wrong radar info and can disturb the preplanned guidance, planning of a radar controlled area/airway and/of (Upper) Airspace and another e.g.: a (digital)communication problem with the "wrong aircraft" ...)
BR,
Robert
No, not visible as (ZD953 and/or RRRxxxx) is non-ADS-B ?T7 wrote:No, not visible as aircraft is non-ADS-B.
Well I'll try to explain what "the problem" is of aircraft look like playing hide and seek at SBS/Airnav boxes (or at our PC screens, e.g. FR24)
Yes, visible as ZD953 is Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast equipped (as part of its Certificate of Military Registration) and still using ICAO 24-bit address "Mode S (Selective) hex-code" 43C1C4 !
But NOT visible as the coupled database, in this case of FR24, isn't up to date.... An SBS/AirNav box is only a receiver of a transmitterresponder signal (simply said: one way signaltraffic from the transponder to the box) and can't interrogate and respond like a Secondary Surveillance Radar system (that has, simply said: 2-way "ask and answer" signaltraffic between SSR and ransponder).
So an SBS/AirNav box needs a transponder with a coupled GPS (of course) AND a database of ICAO 24-bit adresses as reference. The box can't place the "blip" without GPS on your screen (as I said before, can't interrogate). When the SBS/AirnNav box "knows" to place the "blip" (with the help of GPS) on your screen it's just a peace of cake to "check" its coupled database immediately and able to translate the received data signal part of the transponder 's unique ICAO 24-bit address and "the messagetag" appears at your box (or PC) screen
Another issue: when flightcrew is entering wrong flight identity into their Mode S transponder it leads to "misscommunication" between Mode S / SSR (and the possibility of problems when ATC/ACC/UAC's receiving wrong radar info and can disturb the preplanned guidance, planning of a radar controlled area/airway and/of (Upper) Airspace and another e.g.: a (digital)communication problem with the "wrong aircraft" ...)
BR,
Robert