EHGR 22-05-2018 MIL

[Bas_H]

Verder om het geheel van vandaag compleet te maken vlogen er ook nogal wat locals rond. Ik heb niet alles kunnen lezen maar iemand anders misschien wel.

Ochtend:
NAH-64D Redskin42 Q-13 (geïdentificeerd door de L op de onderkant. Kan iemand dit bevestigen?)
NAH-64D Redskin11 Q-04
NAH-64D Redskin06 Q-24
NAH-64D Redskin03 Q-17
NAH-64D Redskin13 Q-18
AS.532U2 Duke2 S-453
CH-47D Grizzly12 D-106

Middag:
NAH-64D Redskin51 Q-04
NAH-64D Redskin52 Q-13 (Weer aan de L geïdentificeerd)
NAH-64D BAT71 Q-18
NAH-64D BAT72 Q-17
AS.532U2 Duke2 S-453
CH-47D Grizzly12 D-103
CH-47D Grizzly11 D-661

[GIPS]

Swedish Blackhawk was callsign 'SWEEDFOR 322', not 'SVF 4332'. Don't ask me why they didn't say 'SweedForce', it was quite confusing this way, also for Gilze tower.

Steef

I think the callsign was meant SVF322 (SweedForce 322), but as it was pronounced "Sweedfor322", tower misunderstood it for "Sweed 4322".
Anyone access to the flightplan?

Flightplan says "SVF332"

[Ecm]

Anyone able to check the con number of the Swedish Hkp-16 please?

[GoldenPlane]

Still 6 choppers are on the 02, on 23 May 08:30LT

[Eric van Lisdonk]

Verder om het geheel van vandaag compleet te maken vlogen er ook nogal wat locals rond. Ik heb niet alles kunnen lezen maar iemand anders misschien wel.

Ochtend:
NAH-64D Redskin42 Q-13 (geïdentificeerd door de L op de onderkant. Kan iemand dit bevestigen?)
NAH-64D Redskin11 Q-04
NAH-64D Redskin06 Q-24
NAH-64D Redskin03 Q-17
NAH-64D Redskin13 Q-18
AS.532U2 Duke2 S-453
CH-47D Grizzly12 D-106

Middag:
NAH-64D Redskin51 Q-04
NAH-64D Redskin52 Q-13 (Weer aan de L geïdentificeerd)
NAH-64D BAT71 Q-18
NAH-64D BAT72 Q-17
AS.532U2 Duke2 S-453
CH-47D Grizzly12 D-103
CH-47D Grizzly11 D-661

Thanks Bas!!

[Richard de Florennes]

Verder om het geheel van vandaag compleet te maken vlogen er ook nogal wat locals rond. Ik heb niet alles kunnen lezen maar iemand anders misschien wel.

Ochtend:
NAH-64D Redskin42 Q-13 (geïdentificeerd door de L op de onderkant. Kan iemand dit bevestigen?)
NAH-64D Redskin11 Q-04
NAH-64D Redskin06 Q-24
NAH-64D Redskin03 Q-17
NAH-64D Redskin13 Q-18
AS.532U2 Duke2 S-453
CH-47D Grizzly12 D-106

Middag:
NAH-64D Redskin51 Q-04
NAH-64D Redskin52 Q-13 (Weer aan de L geïdentificeerd)
NAH-64D BAT71 Q-18
NAH-64D BAT72 Q-17
AS.532U2 Duke2 S-453
CH-47D Grizzly12 D-103
CH-47D Grizzly11 D-661

Thanks Bas!!

Are you sure about that Q-13? Somebody at the fence told me it was Q-14 - unfortunately the only Apache I could not identify on my photos, while I thought Q-14 was also logged on adsb? But I am not sure.
I can confirm all other based helicopters are correct (photo proof).

[ronaldairbus]

Are you sure about that Q-13? Somebody at the fence told me it was Q-14 - unfortunately the only Apache I could not identify on my photos, while I thought Q-14 was also logged on adsb? But I am not sure.
I can confirm all other based helicopters are correct (photo proof).

Can someone confirm the apache with the L-code is the q-13 or q-14?

[Richard de Florennes]

Are you sure about that Q-13? Somebody at the fence told me it was Q-14 - unfortunately the only Apache I could not identify on my photos, while I thought Q-14 was also logged on adsb? But I am not sure.
I can confirm all other based helicopters are correct (photo proof).

Can someone confirm the apache with the L-code is the q-13 or q-14?

Obviously nobody can, is it might be wrong info. Amazingly, yesterday 31 May, an Apache coded L was read off be me and a few other spotters, while adsb said it was Q-09. So there are either more than one Apache coded L or Q-13 AND Q-14 are totally wrong!

[Pauljos2001]

[quote="Richard de Florennes"][quote="ronaldairbus"][quote="Richard de Florennes"]

Are you sure about that Q-13? Somebody at the fence told me it was Q-14 - unfortunately the only Apache I could not identify on my photos, while I thought Q-14 was also logged on adsb? But I am not sure.
I can confirm all other based helicopters are correct (photo proof).[/quote]

Can someone confirm the apache with the L-code is the q-13 or q-14?[/quote]

Obviously nobody can, is it might be wrong info. Amazingly, yesterday 31 May, an Apache coded L was read off be me and a few other spotters, while adsb said it was Q-09. So there are either more than one Apache coded L or Q-13 AND Q-14 are totally wrong![/quote]

In my -[b]older[/b][u][/u]- notes I have Q-13 (Afghanistan 2008 ev.), Q-21 and Q-29 (at least in 2015) coded L.
Q-14 had code X.

Have no spottingdates of those codes, however….

[ronaldairbus]

I think it could not have been the q-09. I have photographed several Apaches this week, none of which corresponds to the L coded apache paint on the tail.
The ones i readoff this week : Q-01 Q-04 Q-05 Q-09 Q-18 Q-24
is there a list of what has flown this day?

[Bas_H]

The Apache does not have the L coded on the tail, but on the bottomside.

[SWAT 11]

Last Thursday I read Q-29 coded L.

It could be that there are more coded Apaches.

[ronaldairbus]

The Apache does not have the L coded on the tail, but on the bottomside.

I know, I mean that the apache with the L on the bottom has other paint on its tail than the other ones that could be read.

Last Thursday I read Q-29 coded L.

It could be that there are more coded Apaches.

Thanks, this could be the one.

[Bunzing]

There are currently (at least) 2 Apaches flying with the code L underneath the fuselage: Q-13 and Q-29. Q-13 is almost impossible to read off on the tail, whereas Q-29 has a much better visible serial. There is also a subtle difference in the L: the one on Q-13 is less wide than the L on Q-29.

The L-coded Apache flying on May 22 was the Q-13, with the narrow L. It was recognisable on that day for another reason, as it carried 2 external fuel tanks, unlike the other Apaches seen on May 22. It flew both in the morning and afternoon.

I positively identified all 5 Apaches in Eric's log from my photos of May 22, by the way.
One addition: the Q-24 (also) flew in the afternoon.

[ronaldairbus]

Thanks for clarifying.
this was indeed the apache with the unreadable serial and external fuel tanks