 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
/reeve.gif)
This aircraft may be more important geo-politically speaking than some people might think...3. Another newbie is the Xian Y-20 transport.
It's amzing how the Chinese do not even try to cover up the fact that they are making exact copies of Western aircraft.3. Another newbie is the Xian Y-20 transport.
Fully agree!Thermal wrote:It's amzing how the Chinese do not even try to cover up the fact that they are making exact copies of Western aircraft.3. Another newbie is the Xian Y-20 transport.
That one and the KJ200 for me. Awesome!andel wrote:Top !!!.
A-50 does it for me !.
. It was parked near the A-50 (or K2000 in China??) and they share the same wing sweep and angle. Also interesting to know this time there was a USAF participant in the static!! Yes....... a C-17 from Hickam, Hawaii. The crew thought the Y-20 was an "interesting" machine. Great politically correct answer!P.Terlouw wrote:The crew thought the Y-20 was an "interesting" machine.
Oh I'd love to witness circuit training if that were the case.Richard from Rotterdam wrote:has to fly with after burner continuously to stay level?
