F-35 Lightning II developments

ImageForum for news and discussions on miltary aviation matters.

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
User avatar
Coati
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1561
Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
Type of spotter: S5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Meppel, Netherlands

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Coati »

First flights are happening at a fast pace right now: BF-32 with buno 168730/VK-12 first flew the 21st of June.


http://www.codeonemagazine.com/news_ite ... em_id=1091

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
User avatar
Piet Luijken
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3954
Joined: 27 Dec 2003, 14:19
Subscriber Scramble: Piet Luijken
Location: Amstelveen

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Piet Luijken »

Delivery flights as well!

Today 25 june:
In the afternoon two JSFs were delivered to Eglin acc their clearance.

It were the F35B ZM137 and F35C 168734/NJ-102.

Today both KLu F35As were seen outside.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Greetings,

Piet Luijken
Scramble Editor
tally
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1186
Joined: 28 Sep 2008, 06:07
Subscriber Scramble: tally

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by tally »

First Flight for the second Dutch F-35A AN-2 (F-002) today, June 27, 2013.

Tally.
User avatar
davechng
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 212
Joined: 31 May 2012, 17:48
Type of spotter: f4
Subscriber Scramble: yes
Location: Plano Texas
Contact:

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by davechng »

really !! I caught him taking off and did like 3 touch and goes.. gave quite a show! I will post pic!

DAveC
www.airwingspotter.com
Dedicated to Military Aviation Spotting
PNegri
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 146
Joined: 21 Sep 2002, 15:58
Location: Phoenix Az

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by PNegri »

Plans for all F-35A training are set with the Air Force announcing Thursday that three more squadrons will head to Luke Air Force Base, Ariz.

The 72 additional jets will bring the total number of F-35s there to 144. The base was already selected to for an F-35A training center last summer. The new announcement means that all F-35A pilots will train at either Luke or at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., the location of the current schoolhouse for instructor pilots.

Luke’s selection continues its tradition of pilot training. It is currently the site of active duty F-16 pilot training, along with the training for Fighting Falcon pilots from partner countries. Foreign F-35A pilots will train at the base.

“The decision to base additional F-35 fighters here ensures the long-term viability of our mission and continues our legacy of training the world’s greatest fighter pilots,” said Brig. Gen. Mike Rothstein, 59th Fighter Wing commander, in a release.

F-35As should begin arriving in 2014, depending on production schedules, according to the Air Force. Luke was selected because of its facility and ramp capacity, range access, weather and capacity for future growth, the service said.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said that while he was happy the Air Force selected the base for training, he was “cautiously optimistic” about the health of the F-35 program.

“I urge [F-35 program head Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan] and the Department of Defense to demand excellence from the Air Force and the contractor to ensure that this critical program builds on recent contracting, technical and manufacturing progress,” McCain said in a June 27 statement.

At least 23 pilots have already been trained at Eglin Air Base, where pilots have logged more than 2,300 sorties and more than 3,500 flying hours, according to the Air Force. In addition to Eglin, F-35s also are flying for operational and developmental testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The Air Force announced in June that it expects the F-35A to reach its initial operational capability in December 2016.
User avatar
Coati
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1561
Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
Type of spotter: S5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Meppel, Netherlands

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Coati »

Next one to fly:

BF-29, 168727/VK-09 took to the skies the 29th of June. Aircraft is destined for VMFA-121.

http://www.codeonemagazine.com/f35_news ... em_id=1093
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
User avatar
Rockville
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1648
Joined: 24 Nov 2007, 00:38

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Rockville »

According to a document released by MODNL the two testaircraft will be handed over to The Netherlands soon:
http://www.defensie.nl/_system/handlers ... 206957.pdf
It's in Dutch only.
tally
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1186
Joined: 28 Sep 2008, 06:07
Subscriber Scramble: tally

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by tally »

July 6, 2013 saw AF-32 as 11-5021 go up for first flight. No markings whatsoever. As a matter of fact this aircraft is still in primer and is yet to be painted.
Last edited by tally on 09 Jul 2013, 03:19, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Starfighter_F-104G
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1259
Joined: 05 May 2012, 17:13
Type of spotter: serial
Subscriber Scramble: no

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Starfighter_F-104G »

Tally...

for AF-33 I have 11-5022 (LRIP V nr 22 F-35A AF-31/52 11-5020/5041)
User avatar
Henk Voortwijs
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3590
Joined: 13 Jan 2004, 20:56
Type of spotter: Radio monitoring
Subscriber Scramble: Henk
Location: Vogelwaarde, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Henk Voortwijs »

Official photos second Dutch F-35 test aircraft

At Lockheed Martin are the first official pictures published by the Dutch second test aircraft of the F-35 (Joint Strike Fighter, JSF). The fighter has late last month its first factory flight.

Translation from Dutch website: http://www.luchtvaartfoto.nl/item/1092/ ... l_F-35.htm
UBC760XLT;UBC780XLT;UBC3500XLT;UBC9000XLT;SANGEAN/ATS-909X
User avatar
Richard from Rotterdam
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2679
Joined: 09 Aug 2004, 12:38

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Richard from Rotterdam »

From Aviation Week: http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.asp ... 592154.xml
More F-35 Delays Predicted
By Bill Sweetman
Source: Aviation Week & Space Technology

July 01, 2013

Less than two years after a new Pentagon leadership team adopted a new integrated master schedule (IMS) for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program—which in 2010 plans was to have been declared operational by now—the latest plan is at risk, according to the Defense Department's chief weapons-tester.

Software required to meet the Marine Corps' limited initial operating capability (IOC) date is already expected to be eight months late relative to the August 2011 IMS, Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation (DOT&E) told the Senate defense appropriations subcommittee on June 19. Radar and electro-optical system snags have delayed weapons integration, consuming all the margin built into weapons testing. Buffet and transonic wing-drop “continue to be a concern to achieving operational combat capability.”

The root of the software delays is that the program has been forced to add tests at a rate that more than offsets better-than-scheduled testing performance. The main causes, Gilmore says, are the helmet-mounted display system (HMDS) and regression testing—which ensure that changes have not caused problems in areas previously vetted. Regression testing alone has already forced the addition of 366 test points in 2013.

Flight-testing of Block 2A, the last non-combat software release, started in March 2012 with the goal of finishing in February, but was only 35% complete at the end of May. The Marines' IOC software release, Block 2B, was to be delivered for flight-test in August, according to the IMS, but is now not expected before April 2014, only six months before the due date for completing those tests. These have to be finished before the program can perform an operational evaluation in 2015 that must be completed before the Marine IOC, set for July-December 2015.

Sacrificing Block 2B capabilities to meet the schedule is not an attractive option, Gilmore notes, because even full Block 2B aircraft will “likely need significant support from other (fighters) . . . unless air superiority is somehow otherwise assured and the threat is cooperative.”

The Block 3i configuration, the basis of the Air Force's planned IOC date (August-December 2016) is also under tight schedule pressure, Gilmore explains. It is wedded to significant changes to the radar, and to the electronic-warfare and communications-navigation-identification processors (not just the integrated core processor, as reported earlier). Lot 6 F-35s, which start deliveries in 2014, include this new hardware and cannot fly without 3i software. “Maturing Block 3i hardware and software will be a significant challenge in the next 12 to 18 months,” Gilmore warns.

The DOT&E adds that “the most significant source of uncertainty” regarding what combat capability the JSF will provide in 2018 is that the program has to deliver an operational Block 3i while concurrently developing Block 3F, which is intended to meet the key performance parameters set in 2001.

Lockheed Martin says it is “confident that we are on track to meet the software development schedule” and says that prime software design for Block 3F is 41% complete.

Results of tests on the long-troubled HMDS are “mixed, according to comments from the test pilots,” says Gilmore's report. For instance, software to reduce the effects of jitter have done so—but at the cost of introducing another instability, described as “swimming” of the symbology. The fix to light leakage or “green glow” requires the pilot to perform “fine-tuning adjustments” of display brightness as ambient light changes.

Another threat to schedule is weapons integration, which Gilmore characterizes as “very slow.” Synthetic-aperture radar modes have provided inaccurate coordinates, and the electro-optical targeting system (EOTS) has had difficulty maintaining tracks. These problems had to be remedied before weapons tests could proceed.

Some radar and EOTS issues have been fixed, but all the margin built into the IMS, for both Block 2B and 3F weapons testing, has been used up before a single guided-weapon test has been performed. Gilmore writes: “The final Block 3F weapon integration tests are likely to be completed in late 2017, instead of fall 2016. This will make beginning operational testing of Block 3F in January 2018 a challenge.”

Current weapons-test goals include a guided AIM-120 test in November 2013—dependent on fixing software deficiencies—a GBU-12 laser-guided bomb test in October and a Joint Direct Attack Munition guided test in December.

Buffet and transonic roll-off—wing drop in high-speed turns, associated with asymmetrical movements of shock waves—still affect all variants of the JSF, despite control law changes. The program will conduct flight tests this year to assess the problem, but has now reached a limit on what can be done with control laws, Gilmore reports. Further changes would degrade maneuverability or overload the structure.

Earlier DOT&E reports have been critical of the F-35's ability to tolerate accidental or combat damage, and the new report follows that pattern. Gilmore observes that lightning-tolerance testing is yet to be completed and that even then, the fighter's airframe will have to be inspected after known lightning strikes—including skin penetration—because it does not use lightning-tolerant fasteners, Conventional fasteners were selected to save weight. Lockheed Martin says that inflight lightning protection has been approved and the critical design review is closed, with more tests due later this year. On the ground, the current plan is that ground crews will purge the fuel systems of parked aircraft with nitrogen, repeating this process as often as once every 24 hr.

Gilmore also notes that the prognostic and health monitoring system, currently, is unable to provide timely detection of combat damage to the F-35B lift-fan system, which “might fail catastrophically before the pilot can react” during transition to vertical landing. Lockheed Martin comments that “in the remote chance of a failure, the pilot would auto-eject.”
tally
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1186
Joined: 28 Sep 2008, 06:07
Subscriber Scramble: tally

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by tally »

Starfighter_F-104G wrote:Tally...

for AF-33 I have 11-5022 (LRIP V nr 22 F-35A AF-31/52 11-5020/5041)
The FY is indeed 11 and is tied to AF-32. Previous post corrected accordingly.
Last edited by tally on 09 Jul 2013, 03:21, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Coati
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1561
Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
Type of spotter: S5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Meppel, Netherlands

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Coati »

The second Dutch F-35 of LRIP-4 als has An US serial, therefore it should be 5022.

Joost

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
User avatar
Starfighter_F-104G
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1259
Joined: 05 May 2012, 17:13
Type of spotter: serial
Subscriber Scramble: no

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Starfighter_F-104G »

I have
LRIP IV
KLU 10-5019 AN-02 F-002

LRIP V
USAF 11-5020 AF-031
USAF 11-5021 AF-032
USAF 11-5022 AF-033
USAF 11-5023 AF-034
USAF 11-5024 AF-035
USAF 11-5025 AF-036
USAF 11-5026 AF-037
USAF 11-5027 AF-038
USAF 11-5028 AF-039
USAF 11-5029 AF-040
USAF 11-5030 AF-041
USAF 11-5031 AF-042
USAF 11-5032 AF-043
USAF 11-5033 AF-044
USAF 11-5034 AF-045
USAF 11-5035 AF-046
USAF 11-5036 AF-047
USAF 11-5037 AF-048
USAF 11-5038 AF-049
USAF 11-5039 AF-050
USAF 11-5040 AF-051
USAF 11-5041 AF-052
raameagle
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1076
Joined: 09 Aug 2006, 15:23

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by raameagle »

Starfighter_F104G,

Nice list! When you say 'I have', is your list based on numbers ordered for each LRIP or confirmed from a 'source' within Lockheed please?

Regards

Mark
Post Reply

Return to “Military Aviation News”