F-35 Lightning II developments

ImageForum for news and discussions on miltary aviation matters.

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
User avatar
Coati
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1561
Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
Type of spotter: S5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Meppel, Netherlands

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Coati »

I certainly care! Thanks Tally!
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
User avatar
Wijgert IJlst
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2189
Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 08:57
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: Wijgert IJlst

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Wijgert IJlst »

Interesting (Dutch article) about the JSF and her alternatives:
http://www.nu.nl/politiek/3387149/genoe ... e-jsf.html
Kind Regards / Groeten,

Wijgert IJlst
Jmillsf18
Posts: 3
Joined: 18 Mar 2013, 18:14
Type of spotter: All things with wings
Location: Ellington field Houston

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Jmillsf18 »

Wijgert IJlst wrote:Interesting (Dutch article) about the JSF and her alternatives:
http://www.nu.nl/politiek/3387149/genoe ... e-jsf.html
Yeah maybe if you can freaking read Dutch.....

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Hans Rolink
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1568
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 22:53
Type of spotter: F4.5
Subscriber Scramble: Hans Rolink
Location: The North of the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Hans Rolink »

Jmillsf18 wrote: Yeah maybe if you can freaking read Dutch.....
I don't blame you for not being able to.
http://translate.google.com/ gives a more than decent translation.

Hans.
User avatar
Flyboy
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2719
Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
Type of spotter: F4
Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
Location: Hillywood
Contact:

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Flyboy »

Wijgert IJlst wrote:Interesting (Dutch article) about the JSF and her alternatives:
http://www.nu.nl/politiek/3387149/genoe ... e-jsf.html
A pity though that the mentioned price of the F-35 is two to three times to low quoted according to the latest estimates. The information is not accurate in this respect which make me wonder about the other aircraft...

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
User avatar
Richard from Rotterdam
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2679
Joined: 09 Aug 2004, 12:38

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Richard from Rotterdam »

One fighter that is missing in all comparisons is the F-16. On the one hand I can imagine that Lockheed doesn't actively promote this to Western countries, only to the 3rd world these days, but the proposed F-16V would tick quite a few boxed I think. Especially with the Dutch minister of defence publicly stating that her doors (the ones to her ministry) are wide open for any fighter producing company to propose alternatives for the JSF.
hammarö
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1591
Joined: 19 Jun 2012, 10:30
Type of spotter: I am not Dutch fluent.
Subscriber Scramble: hammarö

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by hammarö »

Cost of operation (Benchmarking).

Cost of operation is crusial. The investment is important, but most crusial is the cost of operation.

JAS39 Gripen cost about 5000 $ per hour to operate, but Eurofighter/Rafale about 20000 $ per hour and F-35 over 30000 $ per hour (not finished). Then the F-35 begins to operate becomes the cost of operations certainly higher, maybe around 40000 $ per hour (8 times higher than Gripen according Janes).

Janes have made a cost of the operation per hour for following aircraft.
(including all costs inclusive investment, equipment and fuel costs).

JAS39 Gripen 4700 $ / hour

Rafale 16500 $ / hour

Eurofighter 18000 $ / hour

F-35 21-31000 $ / hour (certainly higher then combat ready).

And the Russians have a couple of research projects with their radars to overcome the stealth solustions. (Look at Earth Goggle). See what happened with the F-117 after the Kosovo shut down.
User avatar
Flyboy
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2719
Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
Type of spotter: F4
Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
Location: Hillywood
Contact:

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Flyboy »

Richard from Rotterdam wrote:One fighter that is missing in all comparisons is the F-16. On the one hand I can imagine that Lockheed doesn't actively promote this to Western countries, only to the 3rd world these days, but the proposed F-16V would tick quite a few boxed I think. Especially with the Dutch minister of defence publicly stating that her doors (the ones to her ministry) are wide open for any fighter producing company to propose alternatives for the JSF.
That is actually the most unbelievable part. She (the minister) claims that they need to make a "validated vision"on what the purpose of the armed forces is in the future and the role of the airforce. Depending on that they will state the requirements of the new jet. You bet that all the information given prior to that moment will be used to make a new monopoly for the F-35.

So First new "validated vision", Then requirement for new jets and after that the new proposals, If you jump in to early, youre scre...[censored]
aviodromefriend
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3523
Joined: 03 Dec 2006, 22:10
Type of spotter: zo snel afgekeurd, ik kreeg geen kans S5 te worden
Location: Airshows, EHKD, Where HAT eh took me

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by aviodromefriend »

Flyboy wrote:You bet that all the information given prior to that moment will be used to make a new monopoly for the F-35.
Funny, my interpretation on the item from Nieuwsuur is that even the liberal party, the most staunch F-35 supporter in politics is creating an exit out of the JSF program right now, stating that it will never accept the other services having to suffer from any fighter purchase.
De Zamboni heeft kramp in zijn achterwiel
Jan Maarten Smeets, Heerenveen 31 oktober 2009
User avatar
Coati
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1561
Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
Type of spotter: S5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Meppel, Netherlands

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Coati »

hammarö wrote:Cost of operation (Benchmarking).

Cost of operation is crusial. The investment is important, but most crusial is the cost of operation.

JAS39 Gripen cost about 5000 $ per hour to operate, but Eurofighter/Rafale about 20000 $ per hour and F-35 over 30000 $ per hour (not finished). Then the F-35 begins to operate becomes the cost of operations certainly higher, maybe around 40000 $ per hour (8 times higher than Gripen according Janes).

Janes have made a cost of the operation per hour for following aircraft.
(including all costs inclusive investment, equipment and fuel costs).

JAS39 Gripen 4700 $ / hour

Rafale 16500 $ / hour

Eurofighter 18000 $ / hour

F-35 21-31000 $ / hour (certainly higher then combat ready).

And the Russians have a couple of research projects with their radars to overcome the stealth solustions. (Look at Earth Goggle). See what happened with the F-117 after the Kosovo shut down.

This subject actually belongs in the praethuys section, but the numbers you are showing are not comparable.

From F-16.net (with thanks to "m") about your stated numbers from Janes: Know the figures by Janes, but these figures give no indication at all what a jet really costs per flying hour. Cost per flying hour will differ by country as well .. personnel costs, taxes etc.

Calculated the rough Swiss figures for a Gripen E, some $27,000 per flying hour in percentages. As well compared these figures in same percentages with the cost of a F16 MLU / RNLAF & BAF (Theoretically .. different countries).
Cost per flying hour US 16C/D: some $23,000 per flying hour

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopi ... t-165.html

It looks like the same discussion about combat radius, in which Saab claims a very lage radius, but it turned out to be for a A2A mission with a huge belly tank.

Your claims about Russians overcoming stealth is obviously propaganda, please explain why they are trying to build their own stealth aircraft when this is a dead end anyway.
Last edited by Coati on 03 Apr 2013, 21:56, edited 2 times in total.
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
User avatar
Coati
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1561
Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
Type of spotter: S5
Subscriber Scramble: No
Location: Meppel, Netherlands

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Coati »

aviodromefriend wrote:
Flyboy wrote:You bet that all the information given prior to that moment will be used to make a new monopoly for the F-35.
Funny, my interpretation on the item from Nieuwsuur is that even the liberal party, the most staunch F-35 supporter in politics is creating an exit out of the JSF program right now, stating that it will never accept the other services having to suffer from any fighter purchase.
I think it is a reality check for the complete fighter purchase. The amount of money reserved fro the purchase is never enough for a substantial number of fighters. 4.5B euros? With the latest price known from the Korean fighter competition (144 million euro per F-35A as an export price for aircraft, spares, sims etc) that will be sufficient for 31 aircraft. But also with the other types more than 45 aircraft at the max will not fit, since all fighters purchases will be in the range of 100-150 M per aircraft when looking at the total price (and not flyaway costs or unit costs or whatever).

Please keep the subject to JSF developments instead of discussing.
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
aviodromefriend
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3523
Joined: 03 Dec 2006, 22:10
Type of spotter: zo snel afgekeurd, ik kreeg geen kans S5 te worden
Location: Airshows, EHKD, Where HAT eh took me

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by aviodromefriend »

Coati wrote:Please keep the subject to JSF developments instead of discussing.
:conf:
Forum rules wrote:Forum for news and discussions on miltary aviation matters.
(bold edited by me)
De Zamboni heeft kramp in zijn achterwiel
Jan Maarten Smeets, Heerenveen 31 oktober 2009
User avatar
Flyboy
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2719
Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
Type of spotter: F4
Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
Location: Hillywood
Contact:

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Flyboy »

aviodromefriend wrote:
Flyboy wrote:You bet that all the information given prior to that moment will be used to make a new monopoly for the F-35.
Funny, my interpretation on the item from Nieuwsuur is that even the liberal party, the most staunch F-35 supporter in politics is creating an exit out of the JSF program right now, stating that it will never accept the other services having to suffer from any fighter purchase.
The number of 30 F-35's is what Clingendeal mentioned the maximum the Netherlands could purchase without compromising other armed forves. The VVD is in favour of purchasing these 30 this year. Very convenient if you can rule out competitors based on specs that they provide before the official requirement is send out. Mind the very sttong lobby of the Dutch industry!!!

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
User avatar
Richard from Rotterdam
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2679
Joined: 09 Aug 2004, 12:38

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Richard from Rotterdam »

According to the latest figures, of the 4.5 billion euro that was reserved for the JSF purchase by the Netherlands, only 4,05 Billion is still available. Put against the currently known "price" for the F-35, this means that only 27 can be purchased.
User avatar
Piet Luijken
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3947
Joined: 27 Dec 2003, 14:19
Subscriber Scramble: Piet Luijken
Location: Amstelveen

Re: F-35 Lightning II JSF developments

Post by Piet Luijken »

Well, we already have two jsfs so 28 will be enough.

If we spend less on the jsf, will thus influence the orders for stork?

If we buy another aircraft, what will happen with stork?

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Greetings,

Piet Luijken
Scramble Editor
Post Reply

Return to “Military Aviation News”