ETAR 21-01-2013

ImageThe forum for all movements and news about Ramstein Air Base.

Forum rules
ImageMode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary
Post Reply
User avatar
Elmar
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 481
Joined: 24 Mar 2004, 20:03
Location: Steenwijk

ETAR 21-01-2013

Post by Elmar »

Heard inbound this morning on the radio was:

Rch711, 08-8195 (divert from Spangdahlem, tail confirmed on radio)

Grtz,
Elmar
User avatar
Bennie
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 16541
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!

Re: ETAR 21-01-2013

Post by Bennie »

Elmar wrote:Heard inbound this morning on the radio was:

Rch711, 08-8195 (divert from Spangdahlem, tail confirmed on radio)

Grtz,
Elmar
Another inbound today is RCH103, coming from the West.
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
andel
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2788
Joined: 18 May 2004, 20:54
Subscriber Scramble: andel
Location: andel noord brabant

Re: ETAR 21-01-2013

Post by andel »

Bennie wrote:
Elmar wrote:Heard inbound this morning on the radio was:

Rch711, 08-8195 (divert from Spangdahlem, tail confirmed on radio)

Grtz,
Elmar
Another inbound today is RCH103, coming from the West.



Just called in on 355.800 REACH103 30 minutes out and confirmed tail as C-130 74-1691.
falcx
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 484
Joined: 20 Mar 2004, 13:00

Re: ETAR 21-01-2013

Post by falcx »

Logged the following on a short stop between 15.45 - 17.15;

C-5A/B/M
90009 WV ANG
40061 436th AW, arr.
60011 60th AMW
70028 60th AMW

C-130H
41691 19th AW, arr 16.34

C-17A
33117 MS ANG
88193 62nd AW
80052 62nd AW
21106 62nd AW
66164 60th AMW
77183 437th AW, dep.
30602 437th AW, dep.
77179 60th AMW
88197 62nd AW
44138 AFRC/729th AS

Regards,
Charles
Post Reply