 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
We have a saying in Portugal that translated into english will be something like this: "The just will pay for sinners dees". But, thank you for looking at the pictures.hdehaan wrote:Your great watermarks in this beautiful pictures are a shame.
Its tail number 15132wamovements wrote:Great picures, do you know the serial of the primer F-16? Thanks Dennis
That might be ptspotter, but I don't think hdehaan meant that you shouldn't watermark them at all.ptspotter wrote:We have a saying in Portugal that translated into english will be something like this: "The just will pay for sinners dees". But, thank you for looking at the pictures.hdehaan wrote:Your great watermarks in this beautiful pictures are a shame.
On the other hand, if the poster is afraid of someone stealing his pics, he should be allowed having watermarks. It's his prerogative, just as it is yours to have a different opinion.Krazy wrote:In my opinion this makes it annoying to watch your photos, and that shouldn't be the feeling you are aiming for when people watch your photos, correct?
I didn't say he should not watermark them Pjotrtje.pjotrtje wrote:Nice report, love the Portuguese Falcons!On the other hand, if the poster is afraid of someone stealing his pics, he should be allowed having watermarks. It's his prerogative, just as it is yours to have a different opinion.Krazy wrote:In my opinion this makes it annoying to watch your photos, and that shouldn't be the feeling you are aiming for when people watch your photos, correct?
Do watermark pictures when you don't want them to be stolen, the point that was trying to be made was the size of the watermarks, not the fact that they are there.krazy wrote: but I don't think hdehaan meant that you shouldn't watermark them at all.
