 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
The Falcon has the best angle.. Good to see to difference of the special radarabsorbing paint and the normal Viper color scheme...
Did they land 05?Frank wrote: Here some shots
Spangdahlem 3-2-2012
What I did was use my 300mm 2.8L and use my 2.0 extender to make the landing shots. That would make 600mm. I have a EOS1D so it has a crop factor of 1.3 and I must admit i cropped quite a lot when did edit the image at home. @Crizz.on my screen it looks like I have added enough contrast. On which pictures would you add some more ? 
Frank's pictures generated too much traffic and exceeded the assigned Photobucket-bandwidth... So, tomorrow they'll be visible again!Eric van Lisdonk wrote:It looks like that your pictures already are deleted. I can not see them. Somebody has the same problems with this??
/flyingtigers.gif)
