The 'black' USAF C-32Bs

[Thomas266]

Well Well, lots of Funny rumors in here. Might be somehow mysterious with the C-32B's but I do not believe that they are changing the Serials from time to time.
Same for the E-6B's. Their primary role is by far not to fly around with Seals on Board, and having faked BuNO's painted on. There is no proof that there have been E-6 Aircraft that wear other Numbers as they usualy do.
Cheers
Thomas

[wamovements]

B757-23A(C-32B) MSN25494 which most of the time flies as 00-9001 with hex code AE0449.However,this airframe is believed to have made at least 2 visits to the UK as 99-6143 with it's hax code changed to AE0446.This airframe is also been reported as (0)2-5001.

Yesterday 96143 was at Ramstein and return to Canada via Poland. Today however 09001
arrived at Stuttgart!!!!

[Thomas266]

He he he he he !!!!!

[jheijna]

I do comply Thomas 266 post dd september 18th.

[maaspotter]

B757-23A(C-32B) MSN25494 which most of the time flies as 00-9001 with hex code AE0449.However,this airframe is believed to have made at least 2 visits to the UK as 99-6143 with it's hax code changed to AE0446.This airframe is also been reported as (0)2-5001.

I don't know if it will contribute anything to this topic.. But 02-5001 was recently seen in Puerto Rico, so it seems this airframe is currently using that registration
see also the picture @ this link: http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=981617

[FISHER01]

i also have 4 different Hex numbers

02-4452 hex AE0449
02-5001 hex AE0433
99-6143 hex AE0446
00-9001 hex AE0443

so they repaint the serial and built in a other Mode -S transponder????

i know the US is sometimes paranoia, but i don't beliefe so worse that they doing this

[Le Addeur noir]

In light of various comments on this subject,it seems likely 99-6143 is B757-23A MSN 25491,which officially flies as N226G and is officially operated by L3 Capital LLC,a known shadowy outfit with covert US government connections.The tail number N226G is blocked from flight tracking websites.

Anyone like to nominate a MSN for 02-5001?.

[AK01]

In light of various comments on this subject,it seems likely 99-6143 is B757-23A MSN 25491,which officially flies as N226G and is officially operated by L3 Capital LLC,a known shadowy outfit with covert US government connections.The tail number N226G is blocked from flight tracking websites.

Anyone like to nominate a MSN for 02-5001?.

I do believe Comco is somehow involved in this C32B story.
I doubt if 96143 is N226G.
96143 was at Stuttgart on the 6th of December 2004, i could not find a departuredate so far. It was with US Airforce titles and 96143 .
N226G was noted one day later on Knoxville/TN with large Comco titles on the tail, and N226G. I doubt if they can change this so soon,

N226G is also not 09001 as this was noted for instance on the 28feb2006 at Mildenhall, and N226G on Washington on the same date.

Story continues.
ps N610G is the other comco bird
Pieter,

[RobK]

Hello all,

You guys may find my post on airliners.net forums interesting reading : http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forum ... in/134500/

[wamovements]

Thanks for the interesting story Rob

I do have pictures of (9?)8-6006 from Febr 26, 2000. Please drop me a pm if interested.

[RobK]

Yes please post pics of it, especially starboard side and any that show top of fuselage.

[AK01]

Hi Rob,
Interesting theory you have, i tried to find a solution via SBS data, as far as i can see there are at least 4 C-32B's, and the Comco's are almost impossible part time C-32b,s.
Below is what i did, i checked for each serial to see if they have been noted on the same day, around the same time, and in a different area.
Below some examples in which you can see 09001 can not be the same as 96143/ 25001 /24452 /N226G and N610G. I did the same with all the other frames, and i only have question marks with 96143 and 24452, these could be N610G if they would change there Hex code in-flight which seems unlikely to me as both the C32B and the comco's are full ADS-B, so you would be able to see the change of code on sites like Flightradar24.com etc.
i am now trying to obtain a list of 757's which somehow got out of sight between 1999 and 2005, so airframes for whihc no new identity is known.
Any help on that would be great.

Pieter,

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 25-Apr-11 5:19:59 PM
02-4452 AE0449 Wiener Neustadt, AT 25-Apr-11 5:47:58 PM

00-9001 AE0443 Woodbridge VA-1, US 20-Apr-11 1:02:47 AM
02-5001 AE0433 Atlanta GA, US 20-Apr-11 1:05:08 AM

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 29-Mar-11 5:15:50 PM
N226G A1F7E1 Boca Raton FL, US 29-Mar-11 5:24:13 PM

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 9-Mar-11 2:04:31 AM
N610G A7EF54 Deltona FL , US 9-Mar-11 2:42:22 AM

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 10-Jan-11 10:49:18 PM
99-6143 AE0446 McClellan CA, US 10-Jan-11 7:10:08 PM

02-5001 AE0433 Baltimore MD, US 13-Apr-11 7:25:01 PM
02-4452 AE0449 Woodbridge VA-1, US 13-Apr-11 7:41:56 PM

02-5001 AE0433 Phoenix AZ, US 13-Mar-11 8:59:43 PM
99-6143 AE0446 Omaha NE, US 13-Mar-11 8:37:32 PM

[RobK]

Hi Rob,
Interesting theory you have, i tried to find a solution via SBS data, as far as i can see there are at least 4 C-32B's, and the Comco's are almost impossible part time C-32b,s.
Below is what i did, i checked for each serial to see if they have been noted on the same day, around the same time, and in a different area.
Below some examples in which you can see 09001 can not be the same as 96143/ 25001 /24452 /N226G and N610G. I did the same with all the other frames, and i only have question marks with 96143 and 24452, these could be N610G if they would change there Hex code in-flight which seems unlikely to me as both the C32B and the comco's are full ADS-B, so you would be able to see the change of code on sites like Flightradar24.com etc.
i am now trying to obtain a list of 757's which somehow got out of sight between 1999 and 2005, so airframes for whihc no new identity is known.
Any help on that would be great.

Pieter,

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 25-Apr-11 5:19:59 PM
02-4452 AE0449 Wiener Neustadt, AT 25-Apr-11 5:47:58 PM

00-9001 AE0443 Woodbridge VA-1, US 20-Apr-11 1:02:47 AM
02-5001 AE0433 Atlanta GA, US 20-Apr-11 1:05:08 AM

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 29-Mar-11 5:15:50 PM
N226G A1F7E1 Boca Raton FL, US 29-Mar-11 5:24:13 PM

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 9-Mar-11 2:04:31 AM
N610G A7EF54 Deltona FL , US 9-Mar-11 2:42:22 AM

00-9001 AE0443 Philadelphia PA, USA 10-Jan-11 10:49:18 PM
99-6143 AE0446 McClellan CA, US 10-Jan-11 7:10:08 PM

02-5001 AE0433 Baltimore MD, US 13-Apr-11 7:25:01 PM
02-4452 AE0449 Woodbridge VA-1, US 13-Apr-11 7:41:56 PM

02-5001 AE0433 Phoenix AZ, US 13-Mar-11 8:59:43 PM
99-6143 AE0446 Omaha NE, US 13-Mar-11 8:37:32 PM

Hi AK,

Re the bits I've highlighted, I consider this extremely unlikely for the same reasons I mentioned in the a.net thread : different amount of windows on N610G and 96143. Can you really see them plugging and unplugging the extra window every time they change registration? Remember it's no quick job, it's a major job to remove the glass and plug it with a piece of fuselage so I'd wager a large amount of money that 96143 is not an alias of N610G. Additionally, I don't see them changing the decals every time either.

24452 can't be N610G because it doesn't have an ice probe in any pics spanning nearly a decade. That only leaves one conclusion - 96143 is an entirely separate aircraft.

I also agree with your comments that swapping the hex codes about is unlikely. My main hobby is collecting selcal codes and the codes for N226G, N610G, 96143, 09001 and 24452 have been consistent for well over a decade, both on the airwaves and on flight plans, and all have their own individual codes. I don't have any selcal code info on 25001 or 86006 unfortunately. Re 25001 and 86006, I'm far from convinced that these are aliases of 09001/24452...

Closing on a humorous note, I did receive a private message via the a.net forum from someone reckoning that two of these unknowns are actually ex N591UA and N644AA........ Now I am no conspiracy theorist and so asked the author how this was possible since they crashed on 9-11. I received a lengthy reply accompanied by some youtube links allegedly proving that their crashes were faked and the aircraft are still in existence now under US government control . It's a good story but I'm afraid I don't buy it!

[aviodromefriend]

I received a lengthy reply accompanied by some youtube links allegedly proving that their crashes were faked and the aircraft are still in existence now under US government control . It's a good story but I'm afraid I don't buy it!

[offtopic]Heard those stories also a lot of times already, but not one of them has ever told what happened to the buildings that those planes crashed into in their fake-crash-theories. Was that unfolded in your e-mail?[/offtopic]

[RobK]

I received a lengthy reply accompanied by some youtube links allegedly proving that their crashes were faked and the aircraft are still in existence now under US government control . It's a good story but I'm afraid I don't buy it!

[offtopic]Heard those stories also a lot of times already, but not one of them has ever told what happened to the buildings that those planes crashed into in their fake-crash-theories. Was that unfolded in your e-mail?[/offtopic]

Well...

This video was linked (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5wkyEDI ... re=related) and I was left with the comment to watch it and then come back to him and say I still didn't believe it. As I had nothing better to do with my time late last night I decided to watch it . Half of it is about WTC7 but the other stuff is about the Pentagon crash and I must say that they put forward some very convincing and interesting points. I like to remain open-minded about such things but it just seems way too far-fetched for it to be true imho.

Anyway best get back on topic before this turns into 100 page discussion on 9-11.