 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
To keep the forum readable and attractive for everyone. A post with a small amount of pictures is easier to read / look than a post with a large amount of pictures. Such a large number of pictures is not appreciated by everyone. But the poster can always post more pics if appreciated by the forum members.planespotters.nl wrote:
@Moderator, these are now pictures that we do not often see so why fewer photos?
/elal.gif)
Thijs wrote:Did not say there are bad ones. But a limited set of pictures is more enjoyable and better to watch. If one wants to see more pictures you can always ask the original poster to post more or refer to a website with more pictures.amarx wrote:Best ones?Thijs wrote:could you make a selection of the 10 a 20 best ones? 67 is way too much despite the nice subject.
Thanks in advance!
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
are there bad one's???
I love all the 67's shots
Thijs
No, you are not. We do our best however, for instance by distguishing between the principles of quantity and quality. More is not the same as better. Anton makes great photos of fascinating subjects, and any established photographer will be able to tell you that the strength of a collection is in the selection. The lower the number of photos you need to tell your story, the stronger the impact. Obviously, the choice is entirely up to the photographer, and some stories are more enjoyable when told at a low pace and with detail - if you get what I mean.CoHaBa wrote:Or am i the only one "die verder kijkt dan z'n neus lang is"?
