ehvk 11/02/08
Forum rules
 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
-
topgun1984
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: 08 Mar 2007, 06:45
- Type of spotter: A non cursing 4RTY F4RTY
- Location: Gorinchem
- Contact:
I also view them with 1280x1024 but I see the noise too. I don't think it's that bad but I think it can be much cleaner, certainly with a 20D. As mentioned before the fact that they are shot in JPG can be a cause, try shooting in RAW sometime and see if it's better. You can always save it as high quality JPG when you do your workflowtopgun1984 wrote:i don't bother the noise... they are nice and clean 2 me...
but hey... i'm not looking through a looking glass, maybe i am one of the only viewing with 1280X1024?
grtz...
Topgun1984
-
jimmy van drunen
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 6522
- Joined: 23 Dec 2006, 22:32
- Type of spotter: Photographer
- Location: Tilburg, near EHGR RWY28
-
Redskin301
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 2298
- Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 12:52
- Type of spotter: Graphical
- Subscriber Scramble: nee
- Location: Tilburg
- Contact: